156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25907389)
1. Revision of a single type of large metal head metal-on-metal hip prosthesis.
van Lingen CP; Ettema HB; Bosker BH; Verheyen CC
Hip Int; 2015; 25(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 25907389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pseudotumour incidence, cobalt levels and clinical outcome after large head metal-on-metal and conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: mid-term results of a randomised controlled trial.
van der Veen HC; Reininga IH; Zijlstra WP; Boomsma MF; Bulstra SK; van Raay JJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1481-7. PubMed ID: 26530649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term survival of hybrid total hip arthroplasty with the uncemented CLS cup, cemented Müller cobalt-chromium stem, and 28-mm Metasul™ bearings: Retrospective review of 115 hips after a minimum of 17.8 years.
Erivan R; Villatte G; Lecointe T; Mulliez A; Descamps S; Boisgard S
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1289-1295. PubMed ID: 31526707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 5-year survival analysis of 160 Biomet Magnum M2 metal-on-metal total hip prostheses.
Koper MC; Mathijssen NM; Vehmeijer SB
Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 26541184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
Milošev I; Kovač S; Trebše R; Levašič V; Pišot V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Oct; 94(19):1756-63. PubMed ID: 23032586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomes.
Matharu GS; Pynsent PB; Dunlop DJ
Hip Int; 2014; 24(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 24970319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study.
Bosker BH; Ettema HB; Boomsma MF; Kollen BJ; Maas M; Verheyen CC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):755-61. PubMed ID: 22628588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Migaud H; Putman S; Kern G; Isida R; Girard J; Ramdane N; Delaunay CP; Hamadouche M;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2190-9. PubMed ID: 27255729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High rate of revision and a high incidence of radiolucent lines around Metasul metal-on-metal total hip replacements: results from a randomised controlled trial of three bearings after seven years.
Bjorgul K; Novicoff WN; Andersen ST; Ahlund OR; Bunes A; Wiig M; Brevig K
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 23814237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pseudotumours, cobalt and clinical outcome in small head metal-on-metal versus conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.
van der Veen HC; Reininga IH; Zijlstra WP; Boomsma MF; Bulstra SK; van Raay JJ
Hip Int; 2020 Jan; 30(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 30838896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and first validation of a simplified CT-based classification system of soft tissue changes in large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacement: intra- and interrater reliability and association with revision rates in a uniform cohort of 664 arthroplasties.
Boomsma MF; Edens MA; Van Lingen CP; Warringa N; Ettema HB; Verheyen CC; Maas M
Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Aug; 44(8):1141-9. PubMed ID: 25943898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP; Lachiewicz PF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2134-42. PubMed ID: 26987866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Complications Following Revision of Metal-on-Metal Versus Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Nishio S; Fukunishi S; Yoshiya S; Sing DC; Hansen EN; Vail TP
Orthopedics; 2017 Jan; 40(1):e164-e169. PubMed ID: 27783837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similar incidence of periprosthetic fluid collections after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties and metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties: results of a screening metal artefact reduction sequence-MRI study.
Bisseling P; de Wit BW; Hol AM; van Gorp MJ; van Kampen A; van Susante JL
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1175-82. PubMed ID: 26330582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Isolated polyethylene exchange versus acetabular revision for polyethylene wear.
Restrepo C; Ghanem E; Houssock C; Austin M; Parvizi J; Hozack WJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jan; 467(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 18846409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of the M
Trevisan C; Piscitello S; Klumpp R; Mascitti T
J Orthop Traumatol; 2018 Dec; 19(1):21. PubMed ID: 30535952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
