310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25909270)
1. Cervical laminoplasty developments and trends, 2003-2013: a systematic review.
Duetzmann S; Cole T; Ratliff JK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 25909270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: influence of cervical alignment on outcomes.
Lau D; Winkler EA; Than KD; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):508-517. PubMed ID: 28862572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?
Fujimori T; Le H; Ziewacz JE; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul; 35(1):E9. PubMed ID: 23815254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.
Yukawa Y; Kato F; Ito K; Horie Y; Hida T; Ito Z; Matsuyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):1980-5. PubMed ID: 17700444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.
Ratliff JK; Cooper PR
J Neurosurg; 2003 Apr; 98(3 Suppl):230-8. PubMed ID: 12691377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Discussion of surgical indications for posterior expansive open-door laminoplasty extended to C1 level].
Li Q; Kong Q; Zhang L; Sun T; Li T; Gong Q; Song Y; Liu H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 27(10):1214-20. PubMed ID: 24397134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.
Maruo K; Moriyama T; Tachibana T; Inoue S; Arizumi F; Daimon T; Yoshiya S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):938-43. PubMed ID: 25279653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of preservation of the C-6 spinous process and its paraspinal muscular attachment on the prevention of postoperative axial neck pain in C3-6 laminoplasty.
Mori E; Ueta T; Maeda T; Yugué I; Kawano O; Shiba K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 25525962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.
Blizzard DJ; Caputo AM; Sheets CZ; Klement MR; Michael KW; Isaacs RE; Brown CR
Eur Spine J; 2017 Jan; 26(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27554354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.
Highsmith JM; Dhall SS; Haid RW; Rodts GE; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.
Ogawa Y; Toyama Y; Chiba K; Matsumoto M; Nakamura M; Takaishi H; Hirabayashi H; Hirabayashi K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 15347002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A less-invasive cervical laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy that preserves the semispinalis cervicis muscles and nuchal ligament.
Umeda M; Sasai K; Kushida T; Wakabayashi E; Maruyama T; Ikeura A; Iida H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jun; 18(6):545-52. PubMed ID: 23540735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open-door Laminoplasty with Preservation of Muscle Attachments of C2 and C7 for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Retrospective Study.
Secer HI; Harman F; Aytar MH; Kahraman S
Turk Neurosurg; 2018; 28(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 28345126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is cervical lordosis relevant in laminoplasty?
Kim SW; Hai DM; Sundaram S; Kim YC; Park MS; Paik SH; Kwak YH; Kim TH
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):914-21. PubMed ID: 23541454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of effectiveness between laminoplasty and laminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
Zhang H; Sun T; Lu S; Li Q; Yadav SK
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 23167101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma L; Liu FY; Huo LS; Zhao ZQ; Sun XZ; Li F; Ding WY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11542. PubMed ID: 30024545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.
Shiraishi T; Fukuda K; Yato Y; Nakamura M; Ikegami T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can C3 Laminectomy Reduce Interlaminar Bony Fusion and Preserve the Range of Motion After Cervical Laminoplasty?
Lee DH; Cho JH; Hwang CJ; Lee CS; Cho SK; Ha JK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(24):1884-1890. PubMed ID: 27517513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microendoscopic laminotomy versus conventional laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 5-year follow-up study.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Okada M; Takami M; Nakao SI
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):403-409. PubMed ID: 28708041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion.
Yuan W; Zhu Y; Liu X; Zhu H; Zhou X; Zhou R; Cui C; Li J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 134():17-23. PubMed ID: 25929463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
