These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25909596)

  • 1. Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test.
    Cockmartin L; Marshall NW; Van Ongeval C; Aerts G; Stalmans D; Zanca F; Shaheen E; De Keyzer F; Dance DR; Young KC; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(10):3939-58. PubMed ID: 25909596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of system geometry and dose on the threshold detectable calcification diameter in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Hadjipanteli A; Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Looney PT; Wells K; Dance DR; Young KC
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):858-877. PubMed ID: 28072582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multichannel response analysis on 2D projection views for detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Lu Y; Zhou C; Samala R
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041913. PubMed ID: 24694144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lesion detectability in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using different targets and observers.
    Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC; Wells K
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095014. PubMed ID: 29637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.
    Chan HP; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA; Zelakiewicz S; Schmitz A; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Nees AV; Neal CH; Carson P; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):675-85. PubMed ID: 25007048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study.
    Tagliafico A; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Stevanin C; Tagliafico G; Martino L; Bignotti B; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 25163902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
    Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimized signal of calcifications in wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis: a virtual imaging trial.
    Vancoillie L; Cockmartin L; Lueck F; Marshall N; Keupers M; Nanke R; Kappler S; Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6309-6319. PubMed ID: 38546790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Gao M; Hadjiiski L; Zhou C; Garver K; Klein KA; McLaughlin C; Oudsema R; Rahman WT; Roubidoux MA
    Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6177-6189. PubMed ID: 37145996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening.
    Wahab RA; Lee SJ; Zhang B; Sobel L; Mahoney MC
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():14-19. PubMed ID: 30292258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Kim GR; Ko ES; Park KW
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):319-329. PubMed ID: 29931560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens.
    Rößler AC; Kalender W; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Preuss C; Peter SC; Brehm B; Hammon M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 27888024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of glandularity on the detection of simulated cancers in planar, tomosynthesis, and synthetic 2D imaging of the breast using a hybrid virtual clinical trial.
    Mackenzie A; Kaur S; Thomson EL; Mitchell M; Elangovan P; Warren LM; Dance DR; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6859-6868. PubMed ID: 34496038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Hahn SY; Shin JH; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2538-46. PubMed ID: 26628063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.