These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering. Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional capture in driving displays. Arexis M; Maquestiaux F; Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Didierjean A Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):259-275. PubMed ID: 28369841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs. Wykowska A; Schubö A J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eye of origin guides attention away: An ocular singleton column impairs visual search like a collinear column. Chow HM; Jingling L; Tseng CH J Vis; 2016; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 26790844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. Theeuwes J; Burger R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search. de Fockert J; Rees G; Frith C; Lavie N J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):751-9. PubMed ID: 15200703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc. Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search. Barras C; Kerzel D Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes. Berry JH Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention. Jung K; Han SW; Min Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands. Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]