These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25909986)

  • 41. Salience detection and attentional capture.
    Schubö A
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 19066945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Collinear integration affects visual search at V1.
    Chow HM; Jingling L; Tseng CH
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(10):24. PubMed ID: 23988390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
    Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Distractor-relevance determines whether task-switching enhances or impairs distractor memory.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26594883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
    Lamy D; Zoaris L
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture.
    Moher J; Abrams J; Egeth HE; Yantis S; Stuphorn V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 21691926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity.
    Mulckhuyse M; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1451-8. PubMed ID: 19553494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Testing the effects of perceptual grouping on visual search in older adults.
    Jingling L; Lai SN
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19231. PubMed ID: 36357416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.
    Mazaheri A; DiQuattro NE; Bengson J; Geng JJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16243. PubMed ID: 21386896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture.
    Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA
    Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.