These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25910255)

  • 1. Generating Highly Accurate Predictions for Missing QoS Data via Aggregating Nonnegative Latent Factor Models.
    Luo X; Zhou M; Xia Y; Zhu Q; Ammari AC; Alabdulwahab A
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2016 Mar; 27(3):524-37. PubMed ID: 25910255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporation of Efficient Second-Order Solvers Into Latent Factor Models for Accurate Prediction of Missing QoS Data.
    Luo X; Zhou M; Li S; Xia Y; You ZH; Zhu Q; Leung H
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2018 Apr; 48(4):1216-1228. PubMed ID: 28422674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal Pattern-Aware QoS Prediction via Biased Non-Negative Latent Factorization of Tensors.
    Luo X; Wu H; Yuan H; Zhou M
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2020 May; 50(5):1798-1809. PubMed ID: 30969935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Kalman-Filter-Incorporated Latent Factor Analysis Model for Temporally Dynamic Sparse Data.
    Yuan Y; Luo X; Shang M; Wang Z
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2023 Sep; 53(9):5788-5801. PubMed ID: 35877802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Personalized QoS Prediction Method for Web Services via Blockchain-Based Matrix Factorization.
    Cai W; Du X; Xu J
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 31248105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel QoS-aware prediction approach for dynamic web services.
    Song Y; Hu L; Yu M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202669. PubMed ID: 30133516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Web service QoS prediction using improved software source code metrics.
    Rangarajan S; Liu H; Wang H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226867. PubMed ID: 31940315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responsive and intelligent service recommendation method based on deep learning in cloud service.
    Yu L; Duan Y
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():966483. PubMed ID: 36482898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Personalized QoS Prediction Approach for CPS Service Recommendation Based on Reputation and Location-Aware Collaborative Filtering.
    Kuang L; Yu L; Huang L; Wang Y; Ma P; Li C; Zhu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 May; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 29757995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic QoS Prediction Algorithm Based on Kalman Filter Modification.
    Yan Y; Sun P; Zhang J; Ma Y; Zhao L; Qin Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Automatic Web Service Composition Framework Using QoS-Based Web Service Ranking Algorithm.
    Mallayya D; Ramachandran B; Viswanathan S
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():207174. PubMed ID: 26504894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A QoS Prediction Approach Based on Truncated Nuclear Norm Low-Rank Tensor Completion.
    Xia H; Dong Q; Zheng J; Chen Y; Gao C; Wang Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36016026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Nonnegative Latent Factor Model for Large-Scale Sparse Matrices in Recommender Systems via Alternating Direction Method.
    Luo X; Zhou M; Li S; You Z; Xia Y; Zhu Q
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2016 Mar; 27(3):579-92. PubMed ID: 26011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategies of similarity propagation in web service recommender systems.
    Su K; Zhang X; Liu Q; Xiao B
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Dec; 18(1):530-550. PubMed ID: 33525106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing cloud QoS predictions using OWA in neural network methods.
    Hussain W; Gao H; Raza MR; Rabhi FA; Merigó JM
    Neural Comput Appl; 2022; 34(17):14895-14912. PubMed ID: 35599973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. OPTCLOUD: An Optimal Cloud Service Selection Framework Using QoS Correlation Lens.
    Kumar RR; Tomar A; Shameem M; Alam MN
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():2019485. PubMed ID: 35665291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-Aware Service Ranking Prediction in the Internet of Things Environment.
    Huang Y; Huang J; Cheng B; He S; Chen J
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 28448451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Service recommendation driven by a matrix factorization model and time series forecasting.
    Ngaffo AN; Ayeb WE; Choukair Z
    Appl Intell (Dordr); 2022; 52(1):1110-1125. PubMed ID: 34764601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trust-Enhanced Cloud Service Selection Model Based on QoS Analysis.
    Pan Y; Ding S; Fan W; Li J; Yang S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143448. PubMed ID: 26606388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An improved robust heteroscedastic probabilistic neural network based trust prediction approach for cloud service selection.
    Somu N; M R GR; V K; Kirthivasan K; V S SS
    Neural Netw; 2018 Dec; 108():339-354. PubMed ID: 30245433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.