BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25910537)

  • 1. A randomized double blind control trial comparing filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in cyclophosphamide peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.
    Kuan JW; Su AT; Wong SP; Sim XY; Toh SG; Ong TC; Rajasuriarr JS; Lim SH; Guan YK; Liew HK; Liew PK; Tan JT; Kori AN; Cheng YY; Tan SM; Chang KM
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Oct; 53(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 25910537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim for cytokine-alone mobilization of autologous haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.
    Herbert KE; Gambell P; Link EK; Mouminoglu A; Wall DM; Harrison SJ; Ritchie DS; Seymour JF; Prince HM
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Mar; 48(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 22858510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A single dose of 6 or 12 mg of pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization results in similar yields of CD34+ progenitors in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Bruns I; Steidl U; Kronenwett R; Fenk R; Graef T; Rohr UP; Neumann F; Fischer J; Scheid C; Hübel K; Haas R; Kobbe G
    Transfusion; 2006 Feb; 46(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 16441592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced dose of lenograstim is as efficacious as standard dose of filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and transplantation: a randomized study in patients undergoing autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation.
    Ataergin S; Arpaci F; Turan M; Solchaga L; Cetin T; Ozturk M; Ozet A; Komurcu S; Ozturk B
    Am J Hematol; 2008 Aug; 83(8):644-8. PubMed ID: 18508321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of single-dose pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy for the mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in patients with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
    Kroschinsky F; Hölig K; Platzbecker U; Poppe-Thiede K; Ordemann R; Blechschmidt M; Oelschlaegel U; Schaich M; Hänel M; Bornhäuser M; Ehninger G
    Transfusion; 2006 Aug; 46(8):1417-23. PubMed ID: 16934080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Plerixafor plus pegfilgrastim is a safe, effective mobilization regimen for poor or adequate mobilizers of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: a phase I clinical trial.
    Herbert KE; Demosthenous L; Wiesner G; Link E; Westerman DA; Came N; Ritchie DS; Harrison S; Seymour JF; Prince HM
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2014 Aug; 49(8):1056-62. PubMed ID: 24887382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of pegfilgrastim in mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells.
    Kroschinsky F; Hölig K; Ehninger G
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2008 Jun; 38(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 18490197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following CAD chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Fruehauf S; Klaus J; Huesing J; Veldwijk MR; Buss EC; Topaly J; Seeger T; Zeller LW; Moehler T; Ho AD; Goldschmidt H
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2007 Jun; 39(12):743-50. PubMed ID: 17450182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plerixafor as first- and second-line strategies for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
    Lor KW; Helmons PJ; Belew H; Lane JR; Ball ED
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):596-603. PubMed ID: 22760691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A phase 2 pilot study of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving chemotherapy.
    Russell N; Mesters R; Schubert J; Boogaerts M; Johnsen HE; Canizo CD; Baker N; Barker P; Skacel T; Schmitz N
    Haematologica; 2008 Mar; 93(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 18268285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pegfilgrastim effectively mobilizes PBSC in a poor mobilizer multiple myeloma patient.
    Malerba L; Mele A; Leopardi G; Stramigioli S; Politi P; Visani G
    Eur J Haematol; 2006 May; 76(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 16480428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.
    Kopf B; De Giorgi U; Vertogen B; Monti G; Molinari A; Turci D; Dazzi C; Leoni M; Tienghi A; Cariello A; Argnani M; Frassineti L; Scarpi E; Rosti G; Marangolo M
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Sep; 38(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 16951690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
    Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Filgrastim-alone versus pegylated filgrastim-alone for autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.
    Skopec B; Skerget M; Zontar D; Zadnik V; Zver S
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2017 Aug; 129(15-16):545-551. PubMed ID: 28439700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filgrastim alone versus cyclophosphamide and filgrastim for mobilization in multiple myeloma patients.
    Sarıcı A; Erkurt MA; Bahçecioğlu ÖF; Gök S; Kuku İ; Biçim S; Berber İ; Kaya E; Özgül M
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2021 Aug; 60(4):103159. PubMed ID: 34034961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized, double-blind trial of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for the management of neutropenia during CHASE(R) chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma.
    Kubo K; Miyazaki Y; Murayama T; Shimazaki R; Usui N; Urabe A; Hotta T; Tamura K
    Br J Haematol; 2016 Aug; 174(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 27072050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
    Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of original filgrastim (Neupogen®), biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) and Lenograstim (Granocyte®) in CD34(+) peripheral hematopoietic stem cell mobilization procedures for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant donors.
    Sivgin S; Karakus E; Keklik M; Zararsiz G; Solmaz M; Kaynar L; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2016 Jun; 54(3):410-5. PubMed ID: 27052362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.
    Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.