These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25911405)

  • 41. Evaluation of mean conversion coefficients from air-kerma to H
    Lopez Gonzales AH; Santos JC; Mariano L; Tomal A; Costa PR
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Dec; 36(4):842-857. PubMed ID: 27739403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging, part 1: physical and technical basics].
    Rimpler A; Veit R; Nosske D; Brix G
    Radiologe; 2010 Sep; 50(9):809-20. PubMed ID: 20924743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reduction of occupational radiation dose in staff at the cardiac catheterisation laboratory by protective material placed on the patient.
    Ordiales JM; Nogales JM; Sánchez-Casanueva R; Vano E; Fernández JM; Álvarez FJ; Ramos J; Martínez G; López-Mínguez JR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):272-5. PubMed ID: 25848096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Determination of the dose to persons assisting when X-radiation is used in medicine, dentistry and veterinary medicine.
    Hupe O; Ankerhold U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):478-81. PubMed ID: 21062800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A Monte Carlo study of the energy spectra and transmission characteristics of scattered radiation from x-ray computed tomography.
    Platten DJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):445-56. PubMed ID: 24894101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of phantom type, beam quality, field size and field position on X-ray scattering simulated using Monte Carlo techniques.
    McVey G
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):130-41. PubMed ID: 16489194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A dosimetric evaluation of water equivalent phantoms for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Hill R; Holloway L; Baldock C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):N331-44. PubMed ID: 16237233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A set of patient and staff dose data for validation of Monte Carlo calculations in interventional cardiology.
    Vano E; Sanchez RM; Fernandez JM; Bartal G; Canevaro L; Lykawka R; Melo C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):235-9. PubMed ID: 25802462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An energy-dispersive technique to measure x-ray coherent scattering form factors of amorphous materials.
    King BW; Johns PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):855-71. PubMed ID: 20071771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Radiation exposure to personnel in cardiac catheterization laboratories].
    von Boetticher H; Meenen C; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W; Engel HJ
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 14732954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Study of the formalism used to determine the absorbed dose for low-energy x-ray beams.
    Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6963-77. PubMed ID: 19001702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Proposals for revised factors in intra-oral radiography shielding calculations.
    Worrall M; McVey S; Sutton DG
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 22809656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. MANAGEMENT OF PATIENT DOSES FROM DIGITAL X-RAY CHEST SCREENING EXAMINATIONS.
    Vodovatov AV; Drozdov AA; Telnova AU; Bernhardsson C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):232-9. PubMed ID: 26769906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of operator radiation exposure between C-arm and O-arm fluoroscopy for orthopaedic surgery.
    Park MS; Lee KM; Lee B; Min E; Kim Y; Jeon S; Huh Y; Lee K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 148(4):431-8. PubMed ID: 21525041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Derivation of factors for estimating the scatter of diagnostic x-rays from walls and ceiling slabs.
    Martin CJ; Sutton DG; Magee J; McVey S; Williams JR; Peet D
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Dec; 32(4):373-96. PubMed ID: 23006642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Absorbed dose conversion factors obtained from X-ray spectra measured at water phantom surface].
    Aoki K; Koyama M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Mar; 61(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 15815558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Effective dose transmission of diagnostic X-rays through concrete and lead shields].
    Kato H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Aug; 59(8):965-75. PubMed ID: 12960950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Absorption and scatter with an acrylic plate attached to the front of an X-ray beam limiting device].
    Tachibana M; Izumi T; Yoshinaka M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jul; 58(7):931-9. PubMed ID: 12515961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Do fluoroscopy systems influence the level of scatter radiation exposure during endoscopic procedures?
    Bang JY; Hawes RH; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jul; 27(5):629. PubMed ID: 25828843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Radiation dose and radiation protection for patients and physicians during interventional procedure.
    Chida K; Kato M; Kagaya Y; Zuguchi M; Saito H; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Takai Y
    J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 20339253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.