135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25911600)
21. An efficient method for computing single-parameter partial expected value of perfect information.
Strong M; Oakley JE
Med Decis Making; 2013 Aug; 33(6):755-66. PubMed ID: 23275450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Calculating partial expected value of perfect information via Monte Carlo sampling algorithms.
Brennan A; Kharroubi S; O'hagan A; Chilcott J
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(4):448-70. PubMed ID: 17761960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An optimization approach to calculating sample sizes with binary responses.
Maroufy V; Marriott P; Pezeshk H
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):715-31. PubMed ID: 24697665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Risk-based environmental remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis and the expected value of sample information.
Dakins ME; Toll JE; Small MJ; Brand KP
Risk Anal; 1996 Feb; 16(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 8868224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adjusting Estimates of the Expected Value of Information for Implementation: Theoretical Framework and Practical Application.
Andronis L; Barton PM
Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 26566775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Expected value of sample information for multi-arm cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Welton NJ; Madan JJ; Caldwell DM; Peters TJ; Ades AE
Med Decis Making; 2014 Apr; 34(3):352-65. PubMed ID: 24085289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence.
Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An adaptive multi-level simulation algorithm for stochastic biological systems.
Lester C; Yates CA; Giles MB; Baker RE
J Chem Phys; 2015 Jan; 142(2):024113. PubMed ID: 25591344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Value of information analysis optimizing future trial design from a pilot study on catheter securement devices.
Tuffaha HW; Reynolds H; Gordon LG; Rickard CM; Scuffham PA
Clin Trials; 2014 Dec; 11(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 25084784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical decision making and the expected value of information.
Willan AR
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 17715257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computing the Expected Value of Sample Information Efficiently: Practical Guidance and Recommendations for Four Model-Based Methods.
Kunst N; Wilson ECF; Glynn D; Alarid-Escudero F; Baio G; Brennan A; Fairley M; Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Jackson C; Jalal H; Menzies NA; Strong M; Thom H; Heath A;
Value Health; 2020 Jun; 23(6):734-742. PubMed ID: 32540231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Time and expected value of sample information wait for no patient.
Eckermann S; Willan AR
Value Health; 2008; 11(3):522-6. PubMed ID: 18179665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Value of information analyses of economic randomized controlled trials: the treatment of intermittent claudication.
Groot Koerkamp B; Spronk S; Stijnen T; Hunink MG
Value Health; 2010; 13(2):242-50. PubMed ID: 19818058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating multiparameter partial expected value of perfect information from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis sample: a nonparametric regression approach.
Strong M; Oakley JE; Brennan A
Med Decis Making; 2014 Apr; 34(3):311-26. PubMed ID: 24246566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Value of information methods for planning and analyzing clinical studies optimize decision making and research planning.
Willan AR; Goeree R; Boutis K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Aug; 65(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 22609138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accelerating Monte Carlo power studies through parametric power estimation.
Ueckert S; Karlsson MO; Hooker AC
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Apr; 43(2):223-34. PubMed ID: 26934878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The option value of delay in health technology assessment.
Eckermann S; Willan AR
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 18480035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficient estimation of Pareto model: Some modified percentile estimators.
Bhatti SH; Hussain S; Ahmad T; Aslam M; Aftab M; Raza MA
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196456. PubMed ID: 29715280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Parametric modelling of cost data: some simulation evidence.
Briggs A; Nixon R; Dixon S; Thompson S
Health Econ; 2005 Apr; 14(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 15685641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
