121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25912184)
1. Important tips and numbers on using the cortical step and diameter difference sign in assessing femoral rotation--should we abandon the technique?
Fang C; Gibson W; Lau TW; Fang B; Wong TM; Leung F
Injury; 2015 Jul; 46(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 25912184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cortical step sign as a tool for assessing and correcting rotational deformity in femoral shaft fractures.
Langer JS; Gardner MJ; Ricci WM
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Feb; 24(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 20101131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Letter to the editor regarding "Important tips and numbers on using the cortical step and diameter difference sign in assessing femoral rotation - Should we abandon the technique?".
Hwang PX; Wang CK
Injury; 2023 Nov; 54(11):111038. PubMed ID: 37741171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment With the SIGN Nail in Closed Diaphyseal Femur Fractures Results in Acceptable Radiographic Alignment.
Carsen S; Park SS; Simon DA; Feibel RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jul; 473(7):2394-401. PubMed ID: 25894807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The linea aspera as a guide for femoral rotation after tumor resection: is it directly posterior? A technical note.
Abdelaal AH; Yamamoto N; Hayashi K; Takeuchi A; Miwa S; Morsy AF; Kajino Y; Tsuchiya H
J Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Sep; 17(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 27015892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of low-dose stereography measurements of femoral torsion after IM nailing of femoral shaft fractures and in intact femurs.
Knafo J; Thelen T; Verdier D; Creppy L; Tournier C; Fabre T
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Sep; 102(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 27364964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphological profile of atypical femoral fractures: age-related changes to the cross-sectional geometry of the diaphysis.
Imamura T; Tsurumoto T; Saiki K; Nishi K; Okamoto K; Manabe Y; Oyamada J; Ogami-Takamura K
J Anat; 2019 Nov; 235(5):892-902. PubMed ID: 31355449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Navigation in femoral-shaft fractures--from lab tests to clinical routine.
Wilharm A; Gras F; Rausch S; Linder R; Marintschev I; Hofmann GO; Mückley T
Injury; 2011 Nov; 42(11):1346-52. PubMed ID: 21724185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of using contralateral lesser trochanter as a landmark to prevent rotational malalignment in fracture shaft of femur: a human cadaveric study.
Sawasdipong A; Sudnongbua R
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S221-5. PubMed ID: 20120690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D atlas-based registration can calculate malalignment of femoral shaft fractures in six degrees of freedom.
Crookshank MC; Beek M; Hardisty MR; Schemitsch EH; Whyne CM
Comput Aided Surg; 2014; 19(1-3):48-56. PubMed ID: 24720491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Augmentive plate fixation in femoral non-unions after intramedullary nailing. Strategy after unsuccessful intramedullary nailing of the femur].
Roetman B; Scholz N; Muhr G; Möllenhoff G
Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 18846484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative Correction of Femoral Rotational Deformity Using a Conventional Navigation System and a Smartphone: A Novel Technique.
Cao JQ; Huang JH; Yuan T; Jia WT; Gao H
Surg Innov; 2017 Oct; 24(5):446-454. PubMed ID: 28639848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Torsional abnormalities and length discrepancies after intramedullary nailing for femoral and tibial diaphyseal fracture. Computerized tomography evaluation of 189 fractures].
Bonnevialle P; Andrieu S; Bellumore Y; Challé JJ; Rongières M; Mansat M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Sep; 84(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 9805738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Measurement of fracture malrotation after interlocking intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracture].
Jiang X; Li X; Wang M; Gu X; Zhang B; Sun L; Zhang L; Liu Y; Liu D; Rong G
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 11955382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ipsilateral fractures of the proximal femur and the femoral shaft].
Douša P; Bartoníček J; Pavelka T; Luňáček L
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Oct; 77(5):378-88. PubMed ID: 21040649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhancing rotational placement of reconstruction prostheses of the distal femur after sarcoma resection.
De Smet A; Verrewaere D; Sys G
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jul; 81():47-57. PubMed ID: 32507678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rotational stability of femoral osteosynthesis in femoral fractures - navigated measurements.
Citak M; Kendoff D; Gardner MJ; Oszwald M; O'Loughlin PF; Olivier LC; Krettek C; Hüfner T; Citak M
Technol Health Care; 2009; 17(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19478402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT scanogram for limb length discrepancy in comminuted femoral shaft fractures following IM nailing.
Vaidya R; Anderson B; Elbanna A; Colen R; Hoard D; Sethi A
Injury; 2012 Jul; 43(7):1176-81. PubMed ID: 22541760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography determined femoral torsion is not accurate.
Jaarsma RL; Bruggeman AW; Pakvis DF; Verdonschot N; Lemmens JA; van Kampen A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Oct; 124(8):552-4. PubMed ID: 15309408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical encroachment after cephalomedullary nailing of the proximal femur: evaluation of a more anatomic radius of curvature.
Bazylewicz DB; Egol KA; Koval KJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jun; 27(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 23287752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
