These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25912329)

  • 1. The Influence of Patient Positioning in Breast CT on Breast Tissue Coverage and Patient Comfort.
    Rößler AC; Wenkel E; Althoff F; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 May; 36(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25912329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of patient positioning in breast CT on breast tissue coverage and patient comfort.
    Rößler AC; Wenkel E; Althoff F; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Feb; 187(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25243528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supine breast MRI and assessment of future clinical applications.
    Siegler P; Ebrahimi M; Holloway CM; Thevathasan G; Plewes DB; Martel A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S153-5. PubMed ID: 23083571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TOPOS: a new topometric patient positioning and tracking system for radiation therapy based on structured white light.
    Lindl BL; Müller RG; Lang S; Herraiz Lablanca MD; Klöck S
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042701. PubMed ID: 23556922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a laser system for CT software simulation (EXOMIO) in patients with breast cancer.
    Strassmann G; Vacha P; Osterhaus T; Battmann A; Richter D; Nashwan K; Neidel HO; Klose KJ; Engenhart-Cabillic R
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Sep; 180(9):597-600. PubMed ID: 15378191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast CT.
    Glick SJ
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positioning in breast MR imaging to optimize image quality.
    Yeh ED; Georgian-Smith D; Raza S; Bussolari L; Pawlisz-Hoff J; Birdwell RL
    Radiographics; 2014; 34(1):E1-17. PubMed ID: 24428300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential of spiral breast computed tomography to increase patient comfort compared to DM.
    Wetzl M; Wenkel E; Dietzel M; Siegler L; Emons J; Dethlefsen E; Heindl F; Kuhl C; Uder M; Ohlmeyer S
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 145():110038. PubMed ID: 34818609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Emmons MM; Moss LJ; Hussain S; Baker SP
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4099-118. PubMed ID: 23685899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of shaped filter design on dose and image quality in breast CT.
    Lück F; Kolditz D; Hupfer M; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4205-23. PubMed ID: 23715466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.
    Lindfors KK; Boone JM; Nelson TR; Yang K; Kwan AL; Miller DF
    Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):725-33. PubMed ID: 18195383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment planning of tangential breast irradiation using a simulator with CT-option compared to a conventional CT.
    Sautter-Bihl ML; Hültenschmidt B; Scheurig H
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1999 Dec; 175(12):597-600. PubMed ID: 10633785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D ultrasound computer tomography of the breast: a new era?
    Ruiter NV; Zapf M; Hopp T; Dapp R; Kretzek E; Birk M; Kohout B; Gemmeke H
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S133-4. PubMed ID: 23083562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed radiography-based mammography with 50-microm pixel size: intra-individual comparison with film-screen mammography for diagnosis of breast cancers.
    Onishi H; Masuda N; Takechi K; Nakayama T; Tatsuta M; Mihara N; Takamura M; Inoue Y; Kuriyama K; Kotsuma Y; Furukawa H; Murakami T; Nakamura H
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):836-41. PubMed ID: 19345121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction of patient positioning errors based on in-line cone beam CTs: clinical implementation and first experiences.
    Thilmann C; Nill S; Tücking T; Höss A; Hesse B; Dietrich L; Bendl R; Rhein B; Häring P; Thieke C; Oelfke U; Debus J; Huber P
    Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():16. PubMed ID: 16723023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed tomography for imaging the breast.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Yang K; Burkett GW; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia; 2006 Apr; 11(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 17053979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening.
    Entz K; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2014 Sep; 186(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 24563411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prone table stereotactic breast biopsy.
    Hui JY; Chan LK; Chan RL; Lau AW; Lo J; Chan JC; Lam HS
    Hong Kong Med J; 2002 Dec; 8(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 12459602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of a breath-hold monitoring system in improving the reproducibility of different breath-hold positions in multiphasic CT imaging.
    Grimm LJ; Feuerlein S; Bashir M; Nelson RC
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):754-7. PubMed ID: 23154005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.