These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25913017)

  • 1. Differential reinforcement of other behavior increases untargeted behavior.
    Jessel J; Borrero JC; Becraft JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):402-16. PubMed ID: 25913017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of adventitious reinforcement during differential reinforcement of other behavior: A systematic replication.
    Rey CN; Betz AM; Sleiman AA; Kuroda T; Podlesnik CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2440-2449. PubMed ID: 31950501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior.
    Marsteller TM; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 24844682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Other" behavior and the DRO: The roles of extinction and reinforcement.
    Hangen MM; Romero AN; Neidert PL; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2385-2404. PubMed ID: 32638398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adventitious reinforcement during long-duration DRO exposure.
    Rey CN; Betz AM; Sleiman AA; Kuroda T; Podlesnik CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1674-1687. PubMed ID: 32142174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.
    Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.
    Williams AM; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 10220929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does DRO type matter?: Cycle versus resetting contingencies in eliminating responding.
    Nighbor TD; Cook JE; Oliver AC; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104257. PubMed ID: 33002565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response elimination, reinforcement rate and resurgence of operant behavior.
    Cançado CR; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():91-102. PubMed ID: 23954832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of rules on differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Watts AC; Wilder DA; Gregory MK; Leon Y; Ditzian K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 24114232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delivering alternative reinforcement in a distinct context reduces its counter-therapeutic effects on relapse.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Sweeney MM; Shahan TA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 May; 109(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 29683191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing fixed-amount and progressive-amount DRO Schedules for tic suppression in youth with chronic tic disorders.
    Capriotti MR; Turkel JE; Johnson RA; Espil FM; Woods DW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jan; 50(1):106-120. PubMed ID: 27734468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DRO contingencies: an analysis of variable-momentary schedules.
    Lindberg JS; Iwata BA; Kahng S; DeLeon IG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(2):123-35; quiz 135-6. PubMed ID: 10396766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction of biting and chewing of horses using differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Fox AE; Bailey SR; Hall EG; St Peter CC
    Behav Processes; 2012 Sep; 91(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 22617186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Therapist- and self-monitored DRO contingencies as a treatment for the self-injurious skin picking of a young man with Asperger syndrome.
    Tiger JH; Fisher WW; Bouxsein KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 19949518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing pawing in horses using positive reinforcement.
    Fox AE; Belding DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):936-40. PubMed ID: 26282112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test-specific control conditions for functional analyses.
    Fahmie TA; Iwata BA; Querim AC; Harper JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24114085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Additional free reinforcers increase persistence of problem behavior in a clinical context: A partial replication of laboratory findings.
    Lieving GA; DeLeon IG; Carreau-Webster AB; Frank-Crawford MA; Triggs MM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):253-264. PubMed ID: 29380436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent reinforcement as control procedures during the modification of a preschooler's compliance.
    Goetz EM; Holmberg MC; LeBlanc JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 1141083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fixed momentary dro schedules under signaled and unsignaled arrangements.
    Hammond JL; Iwata BA; Fritz JN; Dempsey CM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 21541110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.