BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25913389)

  • 1. Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy: Effect of Preoperative Risk on Oncologic Outcomes.
    Imnadze M; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 25913389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
    Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural History of Clinical Recurrence Patterns of Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Moschini M; Sharma V; Zattoni F; Quevedo JF; Davis BJ; Kwon E; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 25865061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the optimal definition of misclassification in patients with very low-risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance? Results from a multi-institutional series.
    Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Isbarn H; Suardi N; De Visschere PJ; Futterer JJ; Ghadjar P; Massard C; Ost P; Sooriakumaran P; Surcel CI; van der Bergh RC; Montorsi F; Ficarra V; Giannarini G; Briganti A;
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25620154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy.
    Klein EA; Yousefi K; Haddad Z; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Stephenson AJ; Li J; Kattan MW; Magi-Galluzzi C; Davicioni E
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 25466945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease.
    Badani KK; Reddy BN; Moskowitz EJ; Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Martini A; Whalen MJ; Skarecky DW; Huynh LM; Ahlering TE
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):310.e1-310.e6. PubMed ID: 29625782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men.
    Ross AE; Johnson MH; Yousefi K; Davicioni E; Netto GJ; Marchionni L; Fedor HL; Glavaris S; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Erho N; Lam LL; Humphreys EB; Faraj S; Bezerra SM; Han M; Partin AW; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 26058959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pathologic Outcomes in Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Men Electing Active Surveillance and Immediate Surgery.
    Tosoian JJ; Sundi D; Trock BJ; Landis P; Epstein JI; Schaeffer EM; Carter HB; Mamawala M
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 26456680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
    Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
    Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients.
    Abdollah F; Sood A; Sammon JD; Hsu L; Beyer B; Moschini M; Gandaglia G; Rogers CG; Haese A; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Briganti A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 26119559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy depends on pathologic risk factors: identifying candidates for early salvage therapy.
    Mir MC; Li J; Klink JC; Kattan MW; Klein EA; Stephenson AJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 24007712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.
    Filippou P; Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Perez N; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 26138041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Preoperative Risk Group Stratification on Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Adverse Pathologic Findings at Radical Prostatectomy.
    Jang WS; Kim LH; Yoon CY; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Ham WS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164497. PubMed ID: 27716842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Walz Nomogram and Presence of Secondary Circulating Prostate Cells for Predicting Early Biochemical Failure after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer in Chilean Men.
    Murray NP; Reyes E; Orellana N; Fuentealba C; Jacob O
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):7123-7. PubMed ID: 26514500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.