144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25913468)
1. Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land.
Söderqvist T; Brinkhoff P; Norberg T; Rosén L; Back PE; Norrman J
J Environ Manage; 2015 Jul; 157():267-78. PubMed ID: 25913468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SCORE: a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation.
Rosén L; Back PE; Söderqvist T; Norrman J; Brinkhoff P; Norberg T; Volchko Y; Norin M; Bergknut M; Döberl G
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():621-38. PubMed ID: 25594905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sustainability likelihood of remediation options for metal-contaminated soil/sediment.
Chen SS; Taylor JS; Baek K; Khan E; Tsang DCW; Ok YS
Chemosphere; 2017 May; 174():421-427. PubMed ID: 28187388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options.
Huysegoms L; Cappuyns V
J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():278-296. PubMed ID: 28288362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of PFAS soil remediation alternatives at a civilian airport using cost-benefit analysis.
Drenning P; Volchko Y; Ahrens L; Rosén L; Söderqvist T; Norrman J
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 882():163664. PubMed ID: 37088381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using multiple indices to evaluate scenarios for the remediation of contaminated land: the Porto Marghera (Venice, Italy) contaminated site.
Critto A; Agostini P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Sep; 16(6):649-62. PubMed ID: 19572157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What's the point? The contribution of a sustainability view in contaminated site remediation.
Anderson R; Norrman J; Back PE; Söderqvist T; Rosén L
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 630():103-116. PubMed ID: 29475112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using soil function evaluation in multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability appraisal of remediation alternatives.
Volchko Y; Norrman J; Rosén L; Bergknut M; Josefsson S; Söderqvist T; Norberg T; Wiberg K; Tysklind M
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 485-486():785-791. PubMed ID: 24529453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CERCLA-linked environmental impact and benefit analysis: Evaluating remedial alternatives for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Portland, Oregon, USA.
McNally AD; Fitzpatrick AG; Mirchandani S; Salmon M; Edwards DA
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jan; 14(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 29068521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental and socio-economic sustainability appraisal of contaminated land remediation strategies: A case study at a mega-site in China.
Song Y; Hou D; Zhang J; O'Connor D; Li G; Gu Q; Li S; Liu P
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 610-611():391-401. PubMed ID: 28806555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative Assessment of Life Cycle Sustainability (QUALICS): Framework and its application to assess electrokinetic remediation.
da S Trentin AW; Reddy KR; Kumar G; Chetri JK; Thomé A
Chemosphere; 2019 Sep; 230():92-106. PubMed ID: 31102876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-benefit analysis of copper recovery in remediation projects: A case study from Sweden.
Volchko Y; Norrman J; Rosén L; Karlfeldt Fedje K
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 605-606():300-314. PubMed ID: 28668741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design of a central tool for sustainability evaluation and weighting to decision-making support of contaminated soils remediation.
Braun AB; Visentin C; Thomé A
J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 351():119624. PubMed ID: 38043305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating the soil function concept into sustainability appraisal of remediation alternatives.
Volchko Y; Norrman J; Bergknut M; Rosén L; Söderqvist T
J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():367-76. PubMed ID: 23994579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Societal cost-benefit analysis for soil remediation in The Netherlands.
van Wezel AP; Franken RO; Drissen E; Versluijs KC; van den Berg R
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jan; 4(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 18260208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sustainability assessment of electrokinetic bioremediation compared with alternative remediation options for a petroleum release site.
Gill RT; Thornton SF; Harbottle MJ; Smith JW
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 1):120-131. PubMed ID: 27511828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regional economic impact assessment: Evaluating remedial alternatives for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Harrison D; Coughlin C; Hogan D; Edwards DA; Smith BC
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jan; 14(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 29057621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sustainability assessments of regional water supply interventions - Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analyses.
Sjöstrand K; Lindhe A; Söderqvist T; Rosén L
J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 225():313-324. PubMed ID: 30099146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A decision framework for possible remediation of contaminated sediments in the River Kymijoki, Finland.
Verta M; Kiviranta H; Salo S; Malve O; Korhonen M; Verkasalo PK; Ruokojärvi P; Rossi E; Hanski A; Päätalo K; Vartiainen T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jan; 16(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 18941816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strategic considerations for the sustainable remediation of nuclear installations.
Mobbs S; Orr P; Weber I
J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():153-163. PubMed ID: 28789811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
