205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25913850)
1. Evaluation of outcomes from a national patient-initiated second-opinion program.
Meyer AN; Singh H; Graber ML
Am J Med; 2015 Oct; 128(10):1138.e25-33. PubMed ID: 25913850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction.
Payne VL; Singh H; Meyer AN; Levy L; Harrison D; Graber ML
Mayo Clin Proc; 2014 May; 89(5):687-96. PubMed ID: 24797646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-initiated second medical consultations-patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review.
Greenfield G; Shmueli L; Harvey A; Quezada-Yamamoto H; Davidovitch N; Pliskin JS; Rawaf S; Majeed A; Hayhoe B
BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e044033. PubMed ID: 34561250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second opinions from urologists for prostate cancer: Who gets them, why, and their link to treatment.
Radhakrishnan A; Grande D; Mitra N; Bekelman J; Stillson C; Pollack CE
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(6):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 28263389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [First results of a German second opinion program show high patient satisfaction and large discrepancies between initial therapy recommendations and second opinion].
Weyerstraß J; Prediger B; Neugebauer E; Pieper D
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 May; 133():46-50. PubMed ID: 29482914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-Driven Second Opinions in Oncology: A Systematic Review.
Hillen MA; Medendorp NM; Daams JG; Smets EMA
Oncologist; 2017 Oct; 22(10):1197-1211. PubMed ID: 28606972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic second opinion: what does it add? Patient satisfaction, but diagnosis is rarely altered].
Westland GJ; Nanayakkara PW; Kramer MH; Smulders YM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A777. PubMed ID: 19857308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel.
Shmueli L; Davidovitch N; Pliskin JS; Balicer RD; Hekselman I; Greenfield G
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017 Dec; 6(1):67. PubMed ID: 29221461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Limited benefit of diagnostic second opinions in a neurology department].
Wieske L; Vergouwen MD; Wijers D; Stam J; Smets EM; Richard E
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(32):A3542. PubMed ID: 21835065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there evidence for a better health care for cancer patients after a second opinion? A systematic review.
Ruetters D; Keinki C; Schroth S; Liebl P; Huebner J
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Jul; 142(7):1521-8. PubMed ID: 26687791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Second opinions for spinal surgery: a scoping review.
Ferreira GE; Zadro J; Liu C; Harris IA; Maher CG
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Mar; 22(1):358. PubMed ID: 35300677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second opinion strategies in breast pathology: a decision analysis addressing over-treatment, under-treatment, and care costs.
Tosteson ANA; Yang Q; Nelson HD; Longton G; Soneji SS; Pepe M; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Elmore JG; Weaver DL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 167(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 28879558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Second opinions in medical oncology.
Olver I; Carey M; Bryant J; Boyes A; Evans T; Sanson-Fisher R
BMC Palliat Care; 2020 Jul; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 32693836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Second medical opinions].
Vashitz G; Davidovitch N; Pliskin JS
Harefuah; 2011 Feb; 150(2):105-10, 207. PubMed ID: 22164936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patterns of second-opinion diagnosis in oral and maxillofacial pathology.
Jones K; Jordan RC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):865-9. PubMed ID: 20304686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of a patient-oriented second opinion program in Germany shows a high discrepancy between initial therapy recommendation and second opinion.
Weyerstraß J; Prediger B; Neugebauer E; Pieper D
BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Mar; 20(1):237. PubMed ID: 32192450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of uncertainty in second opinions about prostate cancer treatment.
Hillen MA; Gutheil CM; Smets EMA; Hansen M; Kungel TM; Strout TD; Han PKJ
Health Expect; 2017 Dec; 20(6):1264-1274. PubMed ID: 28521078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in breast cancer reports after pathology second opinion.
Marco V; Muntal T; García-Hernandez F; Cortes J; Gonzalez B; Rubio IT
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 24689830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
