210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25913874)
1. Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardised approach.
Fidalgo BM; Crabb DP; Lawrenson JG
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 May; 35(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25913874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.
Johnson ZK; Siddiqui MA; Azuara-Blanco A
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1607-12. PubMed ID: 17434589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.
Michelessi M; Lucenteforte E; Miele A; Oddone F; Crescioli G; Fameli V; Korevaar DA; Virgili G
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189716. PubMed ID: 29240827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry.
Paranjothy B; Shunmugam M; Azuara-Blanco A
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):670-5. PubMed ID: 18091453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg retina tomograph.
Shunmugam M; Azuara-Blanco A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2317-23. PubMed ID: 16723439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: a systematic review.
Grob ATM; van der Vaart LR; Withagen MIJ; van der Vaart CH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):451-457. PubMed ID: 28000958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation?
Choi YJ; Chung MS; Koo HJ; Park JE; Yoon HM; Park SH
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):706-14. PubMed ID: 27587959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.
Korevaar DA; van Enst WA; Spijker R; Bossuyt PM; Hooft L
Evid Based Med; 2014 Apr; 19(2):47-54. PubMed ID: 24368333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review.
Zafar A; Khan GI; Siddiqui MA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 18954316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals.
Siddiqui MA; Azuara-Blanco A; Burr J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 89(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 15722299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15770041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16539705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compliance with STARD checklist among studies of coronary CT angiography: systematic review.
Walther S; Schueler S; Tackmann R; Schuetz GM; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 24475846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication--before-and-after study.
Wilczynski NL
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):817-23. PubMed ID: 18710977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research.
Prager R; Bowdridge J; Kareemi H; Wright C; McGrath TA; McInnes MDF
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e203871. PubMed ID: 32356885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adequate Reporting of Dental Diagnostic Accuracy Studies is Lacking: An Assessment of Reporting in Relation to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Statement.
Durkan M; Chauhan R; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2019 Sep; 19(3):283-294. PubMed ID: 31732104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. STARD Adherence in an Interventional Radiology Guideline for Diagnostic Arteriography.
Wright B; Howard B; Wayant C; Vassar M
Clin Med Res; 2021 Mar; 19(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 33547165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Laboratory Medicine: Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.
Jang MA; Kim B; Lee YK
Ann Lab Med; 2020 May; 40(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 31858765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
