312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25914199)
1. 4D spiral imaging of flows in stenotic phantoms and subjects with aortic stenosis.
Negahdar MJ; Kadbi M; Kendrick M; Stoddard MF; Amini AA
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1018-29. PubMed ID: 25914199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-V
Callahan S; Singam NS; Kendrick M; Negahdar MJ; Wang H; Stoddard MF; Amini AA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jul; 52(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 31850597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 4D UTE flow: a phase-contrast MRI technique for assessment and visualization of stenotic flows.
Kadbi M; Negahdar M; Cha JW; Traughber M; Martin P; Stoddard MF; Amini AA
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Mar; 73(3):939-50. PubMed ID: 24604617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospectively gated intracardiac 4D flow MRI using spiral trajectories.
Petersson S; Sigfridsson A; Dyverfeldt P; Carlhäll CJ; Ebbers T
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jan; 75(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 25684309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.
Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Sigfridsson A; Lantz J; Carlhäll CJ; Ebbers T
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1249-55. PubMed ID: 25846511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of flow and hemodynamics in the carotid artery using a reduced TE 4D flow spiral phase-contrast MRI.
Kadbi M; Negahdar M; Traughber M; Martin P; Amini AA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1100-3. PubMed ID: 24109884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Highly accelerated 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using a pseudo-spiral Cartesian acquisition and compressed sensing reconstruction for carotid flow and wall shear stress.
Peper ES; Gottwald LM; Zhang Q; Coolen BF; van Ooij P; Nederveen AJ; Strijkers GJ
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jan; 22(1):7. PubMed ID: 31959203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic 4D flow MRI in 2 minutes using compressed sensing, respiratory controlled adaptive k-space reordering, and inline reconstruction.
Ma LE; Markl M; Chow K; Huh H; Forman C; Vali A; Greiser A; Carr J; Schnell S; Barker AJ; Jin N
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jun; 81(6):3675-3690. PubMed ID: 30803006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics.
Kweon J; Yang DH; Kim GB; Kim N; Paek M; Stalder AF; Greiser A; Kim YH
Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3588-97. PubMed ID: 26747263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 4Dflow-VP-Net: A deep convolutional neural network for noninvasive estimation of relative pressures in stenotic flows from 4D flow MRI.
Nath R; Kazemi A; Callahan S; Stoddard MF; Amini AA
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Nov; 90(5):2175-2189. PubMed ID: 37496183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in whole-heart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 Tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study.
Garg P; Westenberg JJM; van den Boogaard PJ; Swoboda PP; Aziz R; Foley JRJ; Fent GJ; Tyl FGJ; Coratella L; ElBaz MSM; van der Geest RJ; Higgins DM; Greenwood JP; Plein S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):272-281. PubMed ID: 28470915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrafast Intracranial Vessel Imaging With Non-Cartesian Spiral 3-Dimensional Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 1.5 T: An In Vitro and Clinical Study in Healthy Volunteers.
Sartoretti T; van Smoorenburg L; Sartoretti E; Schwenk Á; Binkert CA; Kulcsár Z; Becker AS; Graf N; Wyss M; Sartoretti-Schefer S
Invest Radiol; 2020 May; 55(5):293-303. PubMed ID: 31895223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. k-t accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI in under two minutes: Feasibility and impact of resolution, k-space sampling patterns, and respiratory navigator gating on hemodynamic measurements.
Bollache E; Barker AJ; Dolan RS; Carr JC; van Ooij P; Ahmadian R; Powell A; Collins JD; Geiger J; Markl M
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):195-207. PubMed ID: 28266062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using 4D flow jet shear layer detection for the measurement of valve effective orifice area.
Garcia J; Markl M; Schnell S; Allen B; Entezari P; Mahadevia R; Chris Malaisrie S; Pibarot P; Carr J; Barker AJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):891-8. PubMed ID: 24865143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI for neurovascular applications.
Schnell S; Ansari SA; Wu C; Garcia J; Murphy IG; Rahman OA; Rahsepar AA; Aristova M; Collins JD; Carr JC; Markl M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):102-114. PubMed ID: 28152256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time.
O'Brien KR; Gabriel RS; Greiser A; Cowan BR; Young AA; Kerr AJ
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2009 Nov; 11(1):49. PubMed ID: 19925667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets.
O'Brien KR; Cowan BR; Jain M; Stewart RA; Kerr AJ; Young AA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 18581344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phase contrast ultrashort TE: A more reliable technique for measurement of high-velocity turbulent stenotic jets.
O'Brien KR; Myerson SG; Cowan BR; Young AA; Robson MD
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Sep; 62(3):626-36. PubMed ID: 19488986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 4D flow imaging with 2D-selective excitation.
Wink C; Ferrazzi G; Bassenge JP; Flassbeck S; Schmidt S; Schaeffter T; Schmitter S
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Sep; 82(3):886-900. PubMed ID: 31002417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing artifacts in one-dimensional Fourier velocity encoding for fast and pulsatile flow.
Lee D; Santos JM; Hu BS; Pauly JM; Kerr AB
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Dec; 68(6):1876-85. PubMed ID: 22457248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
