These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2591439)

  • 1. Making cancer statistics more informative: measures of the quality of recorded diagnosis in a population-based registry.
    Silcocks PB; Thornton-Jones H; Skeet RG
    Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol; 1989 Oct; 25(10):1467-73. PubMed ID: 2591439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data quality in population-based cancer registration: an assessment of the Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Registry.
    Seddon DJ; Williams EM
    Br J Cancer; 1997; 76(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 9303369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.
    ; Busco S; Buzzoni C; Mallone S; Trama A; Castaing M; Bella F; Amodio R; Bizzoco S; Cassetti T; Cirilli C; Cusimano R; De Angelis R; Fusco M; Gatta G; Gennaro V; Giacomin A; Giorgi Rossi P; Mangone L; Mannino S; Rossi S; Pierannunzio D; Tavilla A; Tognazzo S; Tumino R; Vicentini M; Vitale MF; Crocetti E; Dal Maso L
    Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. PubMed ID: 26951748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.
    ; ;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(1 Suppl 1):1-225. PubMed ID: 23585445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cancer registry of Calvados, hospital registry of the François- Baclesse Center and mortality statistics: comparisons].
    Robillard J; Macé J; Collignon A; Arsène D; Pottier D; Barrellier P; Abbatucci JS
    Bull Cancer; 1985; 72(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 4063539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics.
    Jack RH; Linklater KM; Hofman D; Fitzpatrick J; Møller H
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Nov; 6():281. PubMed ID: 17096838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Degree-of-spread artefact in the New South Wales Central Cancer Registry.
    Barraclough H; Morrell S; Arcorace M; McElroy HJ; Baker DF
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Oct; 32(5):414-6. PubMed ID: 18959542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
    Parkin DM; Bray F
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and completeness of the New Zealand Cancer Registry for staging of invasive breast cancer.
    Seneviratne S; Campbell I; Scott N; Shirley R; Peni T; Lawrenson R
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 38(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 25037979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
    Bray F; Parkin DM
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Missing data and chance variation in public reporting of cancer stage at diagnosis: Cross-sectional analysis of population-based data in England.
    Barclay ME; Lyratzopoulos G; Greenberg DC; Abel GA
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 52():28-42. PubMed ID: 29175263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appropriateness of the standard mortality/incidence ratio in evaluation of completeness of population-based cancer registry data.
    Suwanrungruang K; Sriplung H; Temiyasathit S; Waisri N; Daoprasert K; Kamsa-Ard S; Tasanapitak C; McNeil E
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(12):3283-8. PubMed ID: 22471467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study.
    Villard-Mackintosh L; Coleman MP; Vessey MP
    Br J Cancer; 1988 Oct; 58(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 3207607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of completeness of cancer registration.
    Benn RT; Leck I; Nwene UP
    Int J Epidemiol; 1982 Dec; 11(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 7152789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.
    Malin JL; Kahn KL; Adams J; Kwan L; Laouri M; Ganz PA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):835-44. PubMed ID: 12048271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audit of prostate cancer: validity and feasibility of registry-based staging.
    Silcocks P; Needham P; Hemsley F
    Public Health; 1999 Jul; 113(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 10483075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reusability of coded data in the primary care electronic medical record: A dynamic cohort study concerning cancer diagnoses.
    Sollie A; Sijmons RH; Helsper C; Numans ME
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Mar; 99():45-52. PubMed ID: 28118921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of an improvement in tumor diagnostic and registration methods on the recorded indices of population malignant neoplasm morbidity].
    Prisiazhniuk AE
    Sov Zdravookhr; 1981; (10):27-32. PubMed ID: 7302657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data quality and quality control of a population-based cancer registry. Experience in Finland.
    Teppo L; Pukkala E; Lehtonen M
    Acta Oncol; 1994; 33(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 8018367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival analysis of 2003-2005 data from the population-based Cancer Registry in Macao.
    Lei WK; Yu XQ; Lam C; Leong WK
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 21338197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.