496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25914488)
1. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.
Liu QX; Min JX; Deng XF; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(45):17218-26. PubMed ID: 25493038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two different mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
Zhou D; Liu QX; Deng XF; Min JX; Dai JG
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 May; 10():67. PubMed ID: 25952323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Law S; Fok M; Chu KM; Wong J
Ann Surg; 1997 Aug; 226(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 9296510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.
Saluja SS; Ray S; Pal S; Sanyal S; Agrawal N; Dash NR; Sahni P; Chattopadhyay TK
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Jul; 16(7):1287-95. PubMed ID: 22528571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional and menometric study of side-to-side stapled anastomosis and traditional hand-sewn anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy.
Deng B; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Tan QY; Zhao YP; Zhou JH; Liao XL; Ma Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18848461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.
Orringer MB; Marshall B; Iannettoni MD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Feb; 119(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 10649203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
