These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25914658)

  • 1. Hyper-active gap filling.
    Omaki A; Lau EF; Davidson White I; Dakan ML; Apple A; Phillips C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():384. PubMed ID: 25914658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. L2 Learners Do Not Ignore Verb's Subcategorization Information in Real-Time Syntactic Processing.
    Nakamura C; Arai M; Hirose Y; Flynn S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():689137. PubMed ID: 35126219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs.
    Brusini P; Brun M; Brunet I; Christophe A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1841. PubMed ID: 26696917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Case and Transitivity on Processing Dependencies: Evidence From Niuean.
    Tollan R; Massam D; Heller D
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jun; 43(6):e12736. PubMed ID: 31204798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using self-paced reading in research with heritage speakers: a role for reading skill in the online processing of Spanish verb argument specifications.
    Jegerski J; Keating GD
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1056561. PubMed ID: 37207035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transitivity and non-uniform subjecthood in agreement attraction.
    Yoo MH; Tollan R
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Apr; 52(3):536-553. PubMed ID: 38114715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting complex syntactic structure in real time: Processing of negative sentences in Russian.
    Kazanina N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Nov; 70(11):2200-2218. PubMed ID: 27557566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure before meaning: sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization.
    Kizach J; Nyvad AM; Christensen KR
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76326. PubMed ID: 24116101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye-tracking evidence for active gap-filling regardless of dependency length.
    Chow WY; Zhou Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 30238828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical projection and the interaction of syntax and semantics in parsing.
    Boland JE; Tanenhaus MK; Carlson G; Garnsey SM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):563-76. PubMed ID: 2632799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):550-69. PubMed ID: 17470005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Predictive Value of Tagalog Voice Morphology in Filler-Gap Dependency Formation.
    Pizarro-Guevara JS; Wagers M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():517. PubMed ID: 32351420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dependency Resolution Difficulty Increases with Distance in Persian Separable Complex Predicates: Evidence for Expectation and Memory-Based Accounts.
    Safavi MS; Husain S; Vasishth S
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():403. PubMed ID: 27064660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15968918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre- and post-head processing for single- and double-scrambled sentences of a head-final language as measured by the eye tracking method.
    Tamaoka K; Asano M; Miyaoka Y; Yokosawa K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Apr; 43(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 23516001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-linguistic evidence for memory storage costs in filler-gap dependencies with wh-adjuncts.
    Stepanov A; Stateva P
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1301. PubMed ID: 26388806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Syntactic Constraints and Individual Differences in Native and Non-Native Processing of Wh-Movement.
    Johnson A; Fiorentino R; Gabriele A
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():549. PubMed ID: 27148152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 11873857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The timing versus resource problem in nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from a time-frequency analysis of anaphora resolution in successive wh-movement in native and nonnative speakers of French.
    Dekydtspotter L; Miller AK; Iverson M; Xiong Y; Swanson K; Gilbert C
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0275305. PubMed ID: 36701328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spanish-English L2 speakers' use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading.
    Dussias PE; Cramer Scaltz TR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jul; 128(3):501-13. PubMed ID: 18001689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.