These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25915960)

  • 1. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator.
    Lin Zhang ; Lei Zhang ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Aug; 24(8):2579-91. PubMed ID: 25915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment.
    Gao F; Tao D; Gao X; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2275-90. PubMed ID: 25616080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild.
    Zhang W; Ma K; Zhai G; Yang X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():3474-3486. PubMed ID: 33661733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs.
    Kede Ma ; Wentao Liu ; Tongliang Liu ; Zhou Wang ; Dacheng Tao
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Aug; 26(8):3951-3964. PubMed ID: 28574353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on High Order Statistics Aggregation.
    Jingtao Xu ; Peng Ye ; Qiaohong Li ; Haiqing Du ; Yong Liu ; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Sep; 25(9):4444-4457. PubMed ID: 27362977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BM-IQE: An Image Quality Evaluator with Block-Matching for Both Real-Life Scenes and Remote Sensing Scenes.
    Xu N; Ma D; Ren G; Huang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32575567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features.
    Xue W; Mou X; Zhang L; Bovik AC; Feng X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Nov; 23(11):4850-62. PubMed ID: 25216482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.
    Xue W; Zhang L; Mou X; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Feb; 23(2):684-95. PubMed ID: 26270911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Shen Y; Li H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Oct; 23(10):4270-81. PubMed ID: 25122572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilizing image scales towards totally training free blind image quality assessment.
    Saha A; Wu QM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1879-92. PubMed ID: 25775489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Zhang W; Li D; Ma C; Zhai G; Yang X; Ma K
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2023 Mar; 45(3):2864-2878. PubMed ID: 35635807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Zhang L; Mou X; Zhang D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Aug; 20(8):2378-86. PubMed ID: 21292594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning Receptive Fields and Quality Lookups for Blind Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images.
    Shao F; Lin W; Wang S; Jiang G; Yu M; Dai Q
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2016 Mar; 46(3):730-43. PubMed ID: 25872220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blind quality assessment of authentically distorted images.
    Celona L; Schettini R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 Jun; 39(6):B1-B10. PubMed ID: 36215522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blind Image Quality Assessment With Active Inference.
    Ma J; Wu J; Li L; Dong W; Xie X; Shi G; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():3650-3663. PubMed ID: 33705313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks.
    Ye P; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jul; 21(7):3129-38. PubMed ID: 22410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality.
    Moorthy AK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Dec; 20(12):3350-64. PubMed ID: 21521667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CID2013: a database for evaluating no-reference image quality assessment algorithms.
    Virtanen T; Nuutinen M; Vaahteranoksa M; Oittinen P; Hakkinen J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jan; 24(1):390-402. PubMed ID: 25494511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.