382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25916569)
1. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single- vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: Insights from the ALTITUDE Study.
Hsu JC; Saxon LA; Jones PW; Wehrenberg S; Marcus GM
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1770-5. PubMed ID: 25916569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contemporary rates and outcomes of single- vs. dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead implantation: data from the Israeli ICD Registry.
Leshem E; Suleiman M; Laish-Farkash A; Konstantino Y; Glikson M; Barsheshet A; Goldenberg I; Michowitz Y;
Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 27702848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-coil and dual-coil defibrillator leads and association with clinical outcomes in a complete Danish nationwide ICD cohort.
Larsen JM; Hjortshøj SP; Nielsen JC; Johansen JB; Petersen HH; Haarbo J; Johansen MB; Thøgersen AM
Heart Rhythm; 2016 Mar; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 26593333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical impact, safety, and efficacy of single- versus dual-coil ICD leads in MADIT-CRT.
Kutyifa V; Huth Ruwald AC; Aktas MK; Jons C; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Geller L; Merkely B; Moss AJ; Zareba W; Bloch Thomsen PE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1246-52. PubMed ID: 23889863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.
Baccillieri MS; Gasparini G; Benacchio L; Zorzi A; Marras E; Zerbo F; Tomasi L; Vaccari D; Pastore G; Bonanno C; Molon G; Zanotto G; Fusco A; Carasi M; Zorzi A; Calzolari V; Ignatiuk B; Cannas S; Vaglio A; Al Bunni M; Pedrini A; Olivieri A; Rampazzo R; Minicuci N; Corrado D; Verlato R
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 43(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 25690336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparative Study of Defibrillator Leads at a Large-Volume Implanting Hospital: Results From the Pacemaker and Implantable Defibrillator Leads Survival Study ("PAIDLESS").
Cohen TJ; Asheld WJ; Germano J; Islam S; Patel D
J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 27(6):292-300. PubMed ID: 26028656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation indications and outcomes: lessons from the Nationwide Israeli-ICD Registry.
Amit G; Suleiman M; Konstantino Y; Luria D; Kazatsker M; Chetboun I; Haim M; Gavrielov-Yusim N; Goldenberg I; Glikson M;
Europace; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1175-80. PubMed ID: 24554524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No benefit of a dual coil over a single coil ICD lead: evidence from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.
Aoukar PS; Poole JE; Johnson GW; Anderson J; Hellkamp AS; Mark DB; Lee KL; Bardy GH
Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jul; 10(7):970-6. PubMed ID: 23562699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival after shock therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients according to rhythm shocked. The ALTITUDE survival by rhythm study.
Powell BD; Saxon LA; Boehmer JP; Day JD; Gilliam FR; Heidenreich PA; Jones PW; Rousseau MJ; Hayes DL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(18):1674-1679. PubMed ID: 23810882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of single- vs dual-coil implantable defibrillator leads: An observational analysis from the SIMPLE study.
Neuzner J; Hohnloser SH; Kutyifa V; Glikson M; Dietze T; Mabo P; Vinolas X; Kautzner J; O'Hara G; Lawo T; Brachmann J; VanErven L; Gadler F; Appl U; Wang J; Connolly SJ; Healey JS
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1078-1085. PubMed ID: 30945798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shock efficacy of single and dual coil electrodes-new insights from the NORDIC ICD Trial.
Bänsch D; Bonnemeier H; Brandt J; Bode F; Svendsen JH; Ritter O; Aring J; Gutleben KJ; Schneider R; Felk A; Hauser T; Buchholz A; Hindricks G; Wegscheider K
Europace; 2018 Jun; 20(6):971-978. PubMed ID: 28419217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes with single-coil versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a meta-analysis.
Sunderland N; Kaura A; Murgatroyd F; Dhillon P; Scott PA
Europace; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e21-e29. PubMed ID: 28339860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Failure of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a matter of lead size?
Rordorf R; Poggio L; Savastano S; Vicentini A; Petracci B; Chieffo E; Klersy C; Landolina M
Heart Rhythm; 2013 Feb; 10(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 23063430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apical versus Non-Apical Lead: Is ICD Lead Position Important for Successful Defibrillation?
Amit G; Wang J; Connolly SJ; Glikson M; Hohnloser S; Wright DJ; Brachmann J; Defaye P; Neuzner J; Mabo P; Vanerven L; Vinolas X; O'Hara G; Kautzner J; Appl U; Gadler F; Stein K; Konstantino Y; Healey JS
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 May; 27(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 26888558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.
Dewland TA; Pellegrini CN; Wang Y; Marcus GM; Keung E; Varosy PD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 58(10):1007-13. PubMed ID: 21867834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Single-Coil and Dual-Coil Implantable Defibrillators: A Meta-Analysis.
Kumar P; Baker M; Gehi AK
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 3(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29759689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mortality reduction in relation to implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT).
Ruwald AC; Schuger C; Moss AJ; Kutyifa V; Olshansky B; Greenberg H; Cannom DS; Estes NA; Ruwald MH; Huang DT; Klein H; McNitt S; Beck CA; Goldstein R; Brown MW; Kautzner J; Shoda M; Wilber D; Zareba W; Daubert JP
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 7(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 25136077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal Trends in and Factors Associated With Use of Single- Versus Dual-Coil Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads: Data From the NCDR ICD Registry.
Pokorney SD; Parzynski CS; Daubert JP; Hegland DD; Varosy PD; Curtis JP; Al-Khatib SM
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 3(6):612-619. PubMed ID: 29759435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
Day JD; Doshi RN; Belott P; Birgersdotter-Green U; Behboodikhah M; Ott P; Glatter KA; Tobias S; Frumin H; Lee BK; Merillat J; Wiener I; Wang S; Grogin H; Chun S; Patrawalla R; Crandall B; Osborn JS; Weiss JP; Lappe DL; Neuman S
Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of >10 years.
Kleemann T; Becker T; Doenges K; Vater M; Senges J; Schneider S; Saggau W; Weisse U; Seidl K
Circulation; 2007 May; 115(19):2474-80. PubMed ID: 17470696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
