129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25916749)
1. The value of choice as a reinforcer for typically developing children.
Ackerlund Brandt JA; Dozier CL; Juanico JF; Laudont CL; Mick BR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):344-62. PubMed ID: 25916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of choice on instructional efficacy and individual preferences among children with autism.
Toussaint KA; Kodak T; Vladescu JC
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):170-5. PubMed ID: 26510978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice.
Graff RB; Libby ME
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 10396769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shifting preferences for choice-making opportunities through histories of differential reinforcer quality.
Drifke MA; Tiger JH; Gifford MR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Feb; 52(1):227-239. PubMed ID: 30302759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reinforcement uncertainty enhances preference for choice in humans.
Rost KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Sep; 110(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 29961968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of toy quality for increasing self-control in typically developing preschool children.
Juanico JF; Dozier CL; Payne SW; Ackerlund Brandt JA; Jowett Hirst ES
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 27279386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of some components of choice making.
Sellers TP; Bloom SE; Samaha AL; Dayton E; Lambert JM; Keyl-Austin AA
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 24114160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs.
Vicars SM; Miguel CF; Sobie JL
Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():75-83. PubMed ID: 24270051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Displays of individually-typological features of animals and the person at a choice of strategy of goal-direction behavior].
Merzhanova GCh
Usp Fiziol Nauk; 2011; 42(3):46-64. PubMed ID: 21950008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing preference from tangible to social activities through an observation procedure.
Leaf JB; Oppenheim-Leaf ML; Townley-Cochran D; Leaf JA; Alcalay A; Milne C; Kassardjian A; Tsuji K; Dale S; Leaf R; Taubman M; McEachin J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 26660202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of daily preference across multiple individuals.
Kelley ME; Shillingsburg MA; Bowen CN
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 26816192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choice between contingencies of variation: effects of the requirement of variation upon preference.
Pontes TN; Abreu-Rodrigues J; Souza AS
Behav Processes; 2012 Nov; 91(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 22960371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of and preference for reinforcement and response cost in token economies.
Jowett Hirst ES; Dozier CL; Payne SW
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):329-45. PubMed ID: 26916640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of preference-assessment methods.
Verriden AL; Roscoe EM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):265-85. PubMed ID: 27037669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of the magnitude of the food deprivation motivating operation on free operant preference in mice.
Lewon M; Hayes LJ
Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():135-42. PubMed ID: 25841867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of a history of differential reinforcement on preference for choice.
Karsina A; Thompson RH; Rodriguez NM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Mar; 95(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 21541125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
