These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25916969)

  • 1. Retention Forces between Titanium and Zirconia Components of Two-Part Implant Abutments with Different Techniques of Surface Modification.
    von Maltzahn NF; Holstermann J; Kohorst P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):735-44. PubMed ID: 25916969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-part implant abutments with titanium and ceramic components: Surface modification affects retention forces-An in-vitro study.
    Freifrau von Maltzahn N; Bernard S; Kohorst P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):903-909. PubMed ID: 31230382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
    Gehrke P; Alius J; Fischer C; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments.
    Ebert A; Hedderich J; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18271373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of the influence of titanium nitride coating on the retention force between components of two-part abutments.
    Freifrau von Maltzahn N; Holstermann J; Stiesch M; Kohorst P
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jun; 21(1):285. PubMed ID: 34078345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of reduced airborne-particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments.
    Hansen NA; Wille S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 31703916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant.
    Rohr N; Brunner S; Märtin S; Fischer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):138-145. PubMed ID: 28461047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
    Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of titanium copings to implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Chiam SY; Lee HL; Bedrossian AE; Xu Q; Kuykendall W; Ren A; Hess TA; Ramos V; Chung KH
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 37203989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Debonding Forces for Two-Piece Zirconia Abutments with Implant Platforms of Different Diameter and Use of Different Luting Strategies.
    Zenthöfer A; Rues S; Krisam J; Rustemeyer R; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 30231090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements.
    Sellers K; Powers JM; Kiat-Amnuay S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 27677215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
    Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
    Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
    Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings.
    Ali AO; Kelly JR; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.