363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25916976)
1. Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning.
Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Álvarez-Romero JG; Jupiter S; Adams VM
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1378-89. PubMed ID: 25916976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating approaches for scaling-up community-based marine-protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks.
Kockel A; Ban NC; Costa M; Dearden P
Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31206826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas.
Klein CJ; Chan A; Kircher L; Cundiff AJ; Gardner N; Hrovat Y; Scholz A; Kendall BE; Airamé S
Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 18325043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A habitat-based approach to predict impacts of marine protected areas on fishers.
Teixeira JB; Moura RL; Mills M; Klein C; Brown CJ; Adams VM; Grantham H; Watts M; Faria D; Amado-Filho GM; Bastos AC; Lourival R; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1096-1106. PubMed ID: 28646574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sympathy for the Devil: Detailing the Effects of Planning-Unit Size, Thematic Resolution of Reef Classes, and Socioeconomic Costs on Spatial Priorities for Marine Conservation.
Cheok J; Pressey RL; Weeks R; Andréfouët S; Moloney J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0164869. PubMed ID: 27829042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities.
Yates KL; Schoeman DS; Klein CJ
J Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 152():201-9. PubMed ID: 25684567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation.
Weeks R; Russ GR; Alcala AC; White AT
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 19843129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization.
Gissi E; McGowan J; Venier C; Carlo DD; Musco F; Menegon S; Mackelworth P; Agardy T; Possingham H
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 29767466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incentivizing biodiversity conservation in artisanal fishing communities through territorial user rights and business model innovation.
Gelcich S; Donlan CJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 25737027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trade-offs between data resolution, accuracy, and cost when choosing information to plan reserves for coral reef ecosystems.
Tulloch VJ; Klein CJ; Jupiter SD; Tulloch AI; Roelfsema C; Possingham HP
J Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 188():108-119. PubMed ID: 27940319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accounting for enforcement costs in the spatial allocation of marine zones.
Davis K; Kragt M; Gelcich S; Schilizzi S; Pannell D
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):226-37. PubMed ID: 25103090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A conservation planning approach to mitigate the impacts of leakage from protected area networks.
Bode M; Tulloch AI; Mills M; Venter O; Ando AW
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):765-74. PubMed ID: 25494874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating conservation zone effectiveness for protecting biodiversity in marine planning.
Makino A; Klein CJ; Beger M; Jupiter SD; Possingham HP
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e78986. PubMed ID: 24223870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biodiversity conservation should focus on no-take Marine Reserves: 94% of Marine Protected Areas allow fishing.
Costello MJ; Ballantine B
Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 Sep; 30(9):507-9. PubMed ID: 26321055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of marine reserve systems constructed using different surrogates of biodiversity.
Sutcliffe PR; Klein CJ; Pitcher CR; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 25922982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the spatial diversity of social uses, dynamics, and conflicts in marine spatial planning.
Noble MM; Harasti D; Pittock J; Doran B
J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():929-940. PubMed ID: 31351276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Social contexts and customary fisheries: marine protected areas and Indigenous use, Australia.
Nursey-Bray M
Environ Manage; 2011 Apr; 47(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 20730426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive comanagement of a marine protected area network in Fiji.
Weeks R; Jupiter SD
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1234-44. PubMed ID: 24112643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of marine protected areas on overfished fishing stocks with multiple stable states.
Takashina N; Mougi A
J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 341():64-70. PubMed ID: 24083999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
