242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25917108)
1. Molecular imaging using PET for breast cancer.
Kurihara H; Shimizu C; Miyakita Y; Yoshida M; Hamada A; Kanayama Y; Yonemori K; Hashimoto J; Tani H; Kodaira M; Yunokawa M; Yamamoto H; Watanabe Y; Fujiwara Y; Tamura K
Breast Cancer; 2016 Jan; 23(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 25917108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular imaging of breast cancer.
Oude Munnink TH; Nagengast WB; Brouwers AH; Schröder CP; Hospers GA; Lub-de Hooge MN; van der Wall E; van Diest PJ; de Vries EG
Breast; 2009 Oct; 18 Suppl 3():S66-73. PubMed ID: 19914546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in breast cancer.
Kim BS; Sung SH
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 26(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 22139552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PET/MR in invasive ductal breast cancer: correlation between imaging markers and histological phenotype.
Catalano OA; Horn GL; Signore A; Iannace C; Lepore M; Vangel M; Luongo A; Catalano M; Lehman C; Salvatore M; Soricelli A; Catana C; Mahmood U; Rosen BR
Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(7):893-902. PubMed ID: 28208155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular imaging using PET and SPECT for identification of breast cancer subtypes.
Liu H; Chen Y; Wu S; Song F; Zhang H; Tian M
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1116-24. PubMed ID: 27438531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic significance of preoperative
Higuchi T; Nishimukai A; Ozawa H; Fujimoto Y; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():5-12. PubMed ID: 27569020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 18F-FDG semi-quantitative parameters and biological prognostic factors in locally advanced breast cancer.
García Vicente AM; Soriano Castrejón A; Relea Calatayud F; Muñoz Madero V; Molina Garrido MJ; León Martín AA; Cordero García JM; Pilkington Woll JP; Chacón López-Muñiz I; Palomar Muñoz A
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2012; 31(6):308-14. PubMed ID: 23084013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18F-FDG.
Wang CL; MacDonald LR; Rogers JV; Aravkin A; Haseley DR; Beatty JD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W247-55. PubMed ID: 21785049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Potential of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Imaging.
Linden HM; Peterson LM; Fowler AM
PET Clin; 2018 Jul; 13(3):415-422. PubMed ID: 30100079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between FDG uptake in PET scans and biological behavior in breast cancer.
Shimoda W; Hayashi M; Murakami K; Oyama T; Sunagawa M
Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(3):260-8. PubMed ID: 17690502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET image-derived indices for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Hatt M; Groheux D; Martineau A; Espié M; Hindié E; Giacchetti S; de Roquancourt A; Visvikis D; Cheze-Le Rest C
J Nucl Med; 2013 Mar; 54(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 23327900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current applications of PET imaging of sex hormone receptors with a fluorinated analogue of estradiol or of testosterone.
Talbot JN; Gligorov J; Nataf V; Montravers F; Huchet V; Michaud L; Ohnona J; Balogova S; Cussenot O; Daraï E; Lotz JP; Kerrou K
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 59(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 25693420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PET Imaging of Breast Cancer: Role in Patient Management.
Lebron L; Greenspan D; Pandit-Taskar N
PET Clin; 2015 Apr; 10(2):159-95. PubMed ID: 25829085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography and Clinicopathological Features in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.
Ito M; Shien T; Kaji M; Mizoo T; Iwamoto T; Nogami T; Motoki T; Taira N; Doihara H; Miyoshi S
Acta Med Okayama; 2015; 69(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 26690243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early metabolic response to neoadjuvant letrozole, measured by FDG PET/CT, is correlated with a decrease in the Ki67 labeling index in patients with hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer: a pilot study.
Ueda S; Tsuda H; Saeki T; Omata J; Osaki A; Shigekawa T; Ishida J; Tamura K; Abe Y; Moriya T; Yamamoto J
Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 20617404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast tumors: early prediction of chemosensitivity with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Groheux D; Hatt M; Hindié E; Giacchetti S; de Cremoux P; Lehmann-Che J; Martineau A; Marty M; Cuvier C; Cheze-Le Rest C; de Roquancourt A; Visvikis D; Espié M
Cancer; 2013 Jun; 119(11):1960-8. PubMed ID: 23504954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Groheux D; Martineau A; Teixeira L; Espié M; de Cremoux P; Bertheau P; Merlet P; Lemarignier C
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 28057031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the best time for 18F-FDG-PET evaluation in estrogen receptor-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab?
Altundag K
J BUON; 2021; 26(4):1685. PubMed ID: 34565040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
