212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25917276)
1. Surgical Excision of Advanced Endometriosis: Perioperative Outcomes and Impacting Factors.
Magrina JF; Espada M; Kho RM; Cetta R; Chang YH; Magtibay PM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):944-50. PubMed ID: 25917276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis.
Nezhat CR; Stevens A; Balassiano E; Soliemannjad R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 24928738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Siedhoff MT; Carey ET; Findley AD; Riggins LE; Garrett JM; Steege JF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 23084673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis.
Nezhat FR; Sirota I
JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Patients with Endometriosis with and without an Obliterated Cul-de-sac.
Melnyk A; Rindos NB; El Khoudary SR; Lee TTM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):892-900. PubMed ID: 31279776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis.
Chalermchockchareonkit A; Tekasakul P; Chaisilwattana P; Sirimai K; Wahab N
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 116(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 22093496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative Outcomes of 3-Arm Versus 4-Arm Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Yim GW; Eoh KJ; Chung YS; Kim SW; Kim S; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim YT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 29287717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic hybrid technique in rectal surgery for deep pelvic endometriosis.
Cassini D; Cerullo G; Miccini M; Manoochehri F; Ercoli A; Baldazzi G
Surg Innov; 2014 Feb; 21(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 23657477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 25683998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Laparoscopic Discoid Resection and Segmental Resection for Colorectal Endometriosis Using a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Jayot A; Nyangoh Timoh K; Bendifallah S; Ballester M; Darai E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28987649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical treatment of endometriosis in private practice: cohort study with mean follow-up of 3 years.
Roman JD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20129331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minilaparotomy vs. laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of length of hospital stay.
Perron-Burdick M; Calhoun A; Idowu D; Pressman A; Zaritsky E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):619-23. PubMed ID: 24469276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced Training of Gynecologic Surgeons and Incidence of Intraoperative Complications after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of More Than 2000 Cases at a Single Institution.
McDonnell RM; Hollingworth JL; Chivers P; Cohen PA; Salfinger SG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):810-815. PubMed ID: 29253636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic En Bloc Right Diaphragmatic Peritonectomy for Diaphragmatic Endometriosis According to the Sugarbaker Technique.
Chiantera V; Dessole M; Petrillo M; Lucidi A; Frangini S; Legge F; Scambia G; Mechsner S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 26454194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
