These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25917431)

  • 1. On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception.
    Flecken M; Athanasopoulos P; Kuipers JR; Thierry G
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():41-51. PubMed ID: 25917431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French.
    Engemann H; Hendriks H; Hickmann M; Soroli E; Vincent C
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():209-13. PubMed ID: 26233527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. English speakers attend more strongly than Spanish speakers to manner of motion when classifying novel objects and events.
    Kersten AW; Meissner CA; Lechuga J; Schwartz BL; Albrechtsen JS; Iglesias A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):638-53. PubMed ID: 20853990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers.
    Athanasopoulos P; Bylund E
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Mar; 37(2):286-309. PubMed ID: 23094696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The nature of morphosyntactic processing during language perception. Evidence from an additional-task study in Spanish and German.
    Hohlfeld A; Martín-Loeches M; Sommer W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():9-24. PubMed ID: 31251954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two languages, two minds: flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation.
    Athanasopoulos P; Bylund E; Montero-Melis G; Damjanovic L; Schartner A; Kibbe A; Riches N; Thierry G
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Apr; 26(4):518-26. PubMed ID: 25749698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Event segmentation: Cross-linguistic differences in verbal and non-verbal tasks.
    Gerwien J; von Stutterheim C
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():225-237. PubMed ID: 30092460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological evidence for endogenous control of attention in switching between languages in overt picture naming.
    Verhoef KM; Roelofs A; Chwilla DJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1832-43. PubMed ID: 19580393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fine-tuned: phonology and semantics affect first-to second-language zooming in.
    Elston-Güttler KE; Gunter TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):180-96. PubMed ID: 18489240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects.
    Galashan D; Wittfoth M; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements.
    Papafragou A; Hulbert J; Trueswell J
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):155-84. PubMed ID: 18395705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blue is in the Eye of the Beholder: A Cross-Linguistic Study on Color Perception and Memory.
    Lowry M; Bryant J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Feb; 48(1):163-179. PubMed ID: 30030779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A functional MRI study of a picture-sentence verification task: evidence of attention shift to the grammatical subject.
    Iwabuchi T; Inui T; Ohba M; Ogawa K
    Neuroreport; 2013 Apr; 24(6):298-302. PubMed ID: 23442439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies.
    Heyselaar E; Segaert K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 30185125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Rossi S; Gugler MF; Friederici AD; Hahne A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 18(12):2030-48. PubMed ID: 17129189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motion events in language and cognition.
    Gennari SP; Sloman SA; Malt BC; Fitch WT
    Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):49-79. PubMed ID: 11814486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual shift in bilingualism: brain potentials reveal plasticity in pre-attentive colour perception.
    Athanasopoulos P; Dering B; Wiggett A; Kuipers JR; Thierry G
    Cognition; 2010 Sep; 116(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 20566193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain potentials reveal differential processing of masculine and feminine grammatical gender in native Spanish speakers.
    Beatty-Martínez AL; Bruni MR; Bajo MT; Dussias PE
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Mar; 58(3):e13737. PubMed ID: 33263933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keeping the Result in Sight and Mind: General Cognitive Principles and Language-Specific Influences in the Perception and Memory of Resultative Events.
    Sakarias M; Flecken M
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 43(1):. PubMed ID: 30648801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization.
    Cubelli R; Paolieri D; Lotto L; Job R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):449-60. PubMed ID: 21261427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.