253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25918167)
1. Genomic prediction of complex human traits: relatedness, trait architecture and predictive meta-models.
Spiliopoulou A; Nagy R; Bermingham ML; Huffman JE; Hayward C; Vitart V; Rudan I; Campbell H; Wright AF; Wilson JF; Pong-Wong R; Agakov F; Navarro P; Haley CS
Hum Mol Genet; 2015 Jul; 24(14):4167-82. PubMed ID: 25918167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic prediction of quantitative lipid traits: comparing shrinkage models to gene scores.
Warren H; Casas JP; Hingorani A; Dudbridge F; Whittaker J
Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 38(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 24272946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic Prediction Using Individual-Level Data and Summary Statistics from Multiple Populations.
Vandenplas J; Calus MPL; Gorjanc G
Genetics; 2018 Sep; 210(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 30021793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?
Veturi Y; Ritchie MD
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2018; 23():228-239. PubMed ID: 29218884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):37. PubMed ID: 24912924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-parametric Polygenic Risk Prediction via Partitioned GWAS Summary Statistics.
Chun S; Imakaev M; Hui D; Patsopoulos NA; Neale BM; Kathiresan S; Stitziel NO; Sunyaev SR
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 107(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 32470373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic Prediction for Grain Yield and Yield-Related Traits in Chinese Winter Wheat.
Ali M; Zhang Y; Rasheed A; Wang J; Zhang L
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 32079240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient cross-trait penalized regression increases prediction accuracy in large cohorts using secondary phenotypes.
Chung W; Chen J; Turman C; Lindstrom S; Zhu Z; Loh PR; Kraft P; Liang L
Nat Commun; 2019 Feb; 10(1):569. PubMed ID: 30718517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of high-dimensional feature selection: evaluation for genomic prediction in man.
Bermingham ML; Pong-Wong R; Spiliopoulou A; Hayward C; Rudan I; Campbell H; Wright AF; Wilson JF; Agakov F; Navarro P; Haley CS
Sci Rep; 2015 May; 5():10312. PubMed ID: 25988841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits.
MacLeod IM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Haile-Mariam M; Kemper KE; Chamberlain AJ; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
BMC Genomics; 2016 Feb; 17():144. PubMed ID: 26920147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Across-cohort QC analyses of GWAS summary statistics from complex traits.
Chen GB; Lee SH; Robinson MR; Trzaskowski M; Zhu ZX; Winkler TW; Day FR; Croteau-Chonka DC; Wood AR; Locke AE; Kutalik Z; Loos RJF; Frayling TM; Hirschhorn JN; Yang J; Wray NR; ; Visscher PM
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 25(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 27552965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.
Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J
BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic Prediction for Quantitative Traits Is Improved by Mapping Variants to Gene Ontology Categories in Drosophila melanogaster.
Edwards SM; Sørensen IF; Sarup P; Mackay TF; Sørensen P
Genetics; 2016 Aug; 203(4):1871-83. PubMed ID: 27235308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic selection and complex trait prediction using a fast EM algorithm applied to genome-wide markers.
Shepherd RK; Meuwissen TH; Woolliams JA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11():529. PubMed ID: 20969788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
