264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25919115)
21. Integrated PET/MR mammography for quantitative analysis and correlation to prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kong E; Chun KA; Bae YK; Cho IH
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 26784940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.
Xin J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Sun H; Zhang S; Liu C; Zhai W
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 26971419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measurement of SUVmax plus ADCmin of the primary tumour is a predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.
Nakamura K; Joja I; Kodama J; Hongo A; Hiramatsu Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Feb; 39(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 22072286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preoperative risk stratification using (18)F-FDG PET/CT in women with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Ahn BC; Hong CM; Song BI; Kim HW; Kang S; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee J
Nuklearmedizin; 2011; 50(5):204-13. PubMed ID: 21727990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PET/MRI for evaluating subclinical inflammation of ulcerative colitis.
Shih IL; Wei SC; Yen RF; Chang CC; Ko CL; Lin BR; Shun CT; Liu KL; Wong JM; Chang YC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Mar; 47(3):737-745. PubMed ID: 28640521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings in endometrial cancer patients: the correlation between SUVmax and clinicopathologic features.
Boonya-ussadorn T; Choi WH; Hyun J; Kim SH; Chung SK; Yoo IeR
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Feb; 97 Suppl 2():S115-22. PubMed ID: 25518184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic value of
Yu CW; Chen XJ; Lin YH; Tseng YH; Lu CC; Chen BB; Wei SY; Lee JM; Shih TT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108671. PubMed ID: 31629121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.
Cao K; Gao M; Sun YS; Li YL; Sun Y; Gao YN; Zhang XP
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1926-30. PubMed ID: 21592709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of PET/MR image coregistration of cervical lesions.
Zhang S; Xin J; Sun H; Ma J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Zhao X
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 26813988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging of lymphoma nodal target lesions: Comparison of PET standardized uptake value (SUV) with MR apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).
Bernstine H; Domachevsky L; Nidam M; Goldberg N; Abadi-Korek I; Shpilberg O; Groshar D
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0490. PubMed ID: 29668631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Endometrial Cancer: Combined MR Volumetry and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Assessment of Myometrial and Lymphovascular Invasion and Tumor Grade.
Nougaret S; Reinhold C; Alsharif SS; Addley H; Arceneau J; Molinari N; Guiu B; Sala E
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):797-808. PubMed ID: 25928157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hybrid imaging for detection of carcinoma of unknown primary: A preliminary comparison trial of whole-body PET/MRI versus PET/CT.
Ruhlmann V; Ruhlmann M; Bellendorf A; Grueneisen J; Sawicki LM; Grafe H; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Umutlu L
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 27776644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging for resected lung cancer: correlation of maximum standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Usuda K; Funasaki A; Sekimura A; Motono N; Matoba M; Doai M; Yamada S; Ueda Y; Uramoto H
Med Oncol; 2018 Apr; 35(5):66. PubMed ID: 29633024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High standardized uptake values of
Yang Z; Wu JR; Wei LL; Liao GX; Yang CJ; Jin GQ; Xiao GY; Su DK
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 31273350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Response to chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and (18) F-FDG-PET/CT: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and partial volume corrected standardized uptake value with histological tumor regression grade.
Giganti F; De Cobelli F; Canevari C; Orsenigo E; Gallivanone F; Esposito A; Castiglioni I; Ambrosi A; Albarello L; Mazza E; Gianolli L; Staudacher C; Del Maschio A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1147-57. PubMed ID: 24214734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The preoperative SUVmax is superior to ADCmin of the primary tumour as a predictor of disease recurrence and survival in patients with endometrial cancer.
Nakamura K; Joja I; Fukushima C; Haruma T; Hayashi C; Kusumoto T; Seki N; Hongo A; Hiramatsu Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jan; 40(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 22968401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Standardized uptake value and metabolic tumor volume measured by ¹⁸F FDG PET/CT are sensitive biomarkers for the presence of lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Vural GU; Akkas BE; Demirel BB
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 25018135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Estimation of proliferative potentiality of central neurocytoma: correlational analysis of minimum ADC and maximum SUV with MIB-1 labeling index.
Sakamoto R; Okada T; Kanagaki M; Yamamoto A; Fushimi Y; Kakigi T; Arakawa Y; Takahashi JC; Mikami Y; Togashi K
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 24477268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and
Lee SY; Jee WH; Yoo IR; Jung JY; Im SA; Chung YG; Kang JH
Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20181051. PubMed ID: 31322913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
