546 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25919239)
1. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker for assessing the proliferative potential of invasive ductal breast cancer.
Zhuang Z; Zhang Q; Zhang D; Cheng F; Suo S; Geng X; Hua J; Xu J
Clin Radiol; 2018 May; 73(5):473-478. PubMed ID: 29273228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perfusion Parameters in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Diffusion-weighted MRI:: Association with Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer.
Lee HS; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Baek JE; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):446-56. PubMed ID: 26852247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Luminal-type breast cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients with the Ki-67 labeling index.
Mori N; Ota H; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Ishida T; Watanabe G; Tada H; Watanabe M; Takase K; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 25203132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
Razek AA; Gaballa G; Denewer A; Nada N
NMR Biomed; 2010 Jul; 23(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 20232453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association among T2 signal intensity, necrosis, ADC and Ki-67 in estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim SY; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Koo JS; Kim SG; Kim MJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 54():176-182. PubMed ID: 30172938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Added value of mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values for evaluating histologic phenotypes of invasive ductal breast cancer with MR imaging.
Suo S; Zhang D; Cheng F; Cao M; Hua J; Lu J; Xu J
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 30116958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic Significance of Progesterone Receptor Expression in Estrogen-Receptor Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer With a Low Ki-67 Labeling Index.
Ono M; Tsuda H; Yoshida M; Shimizu C; Kinoshita T; Tamura K
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 27477822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative MRI Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: Comparison of Luminal A Versus Luminal B Subtypes in a Paradigm Using Ki-67 and Receptor Status.
Plaza MJ; Handa P; Esserman LE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):910-915. PubMed ID: 28140614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ki-67 is a prognostic marker for hormone receptor positive tumors.
Pérez-López ME; García-Gómez J; Alves MT; Paradela A; García-Mata J; García-Caballero T
Clin Transl Oncol; 2016 Oct; 18(10):996-1002. PubMed ID: 26742937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting metastasis in clinically negative axillary lymph nodes with minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in luminal A-like breast cancer.
Kato F; Kudo K; Yamashita H; Baba M; Shimizu A; Oyama-Manabe N; Kinoshita R; Li R; Shirato H
Breast Cancer; 2019 Sep; 26(5):628-636. PubMed ID: 30937834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers.
Martincich L; Deantoni V; Bertotto I; Redana S; Kubatzki F; Sarotto I; Rossi V; Liotti M; Ponzone R; Aglietta M; Regge D; Montemurro F
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jul; 22(7):1519-28. PubMed ID: 22411304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers.
Koo HR; Cho N; Song IC; Kim H; Chang JM; Yi A; Yun BL; Moon WK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 22392859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot predict molecular subtype and lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Surov A; Chang YW; Li L; Martincich L; Partridge SC; Kim JY; Wienke A
BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1043. PubMed ID: 31690273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Kim SH; Cha ES; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jung JH; Park YG; Suh YJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):615-20. PubMed ID: 19711411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Prognostic Factors and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer With a Continuous-Time Random-Walk MR Diffusion Model: Using Whole Tumor Histogram Analysis.
Qin Y; Tang C; Hu Q; Yi J; Yin T; Ai T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jul; 58(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 36251468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer.
Kamitani T; Matsuo Y; Yabuuchi H; Fujita N; Nagao M; Jinnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Tokunaga E; Kubo M; Yamamoto H; Yoshiura T; Honda H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2013; 12(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 23857151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
