BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25919668)

  • 1. A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Carlsen AN; May C; Forgaard CJ; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():36-42. PubMed ID: 25919668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.
    Drummond NM; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):379-388. PubMed ID: 27738717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced motor preparation during dual-task performance: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carter MJ; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2673-83. PubMed ID: 26026810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 15480608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of prepulse inhibition timing on the startle reflex and reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Kennedy PM; Forgaard CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Apr; 513(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 22387455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements.
    Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ
    J Physiol; 2001 Aug; 535(Pt 1):289-300. PubMed ID: 11507178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Timeline of Motor Preparatory State Prior to Response Initiation: Evidence from Startle.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jan; 397():80-93. PubMed ID: 30471355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of timing preparation during response initiation and execution using a startling acoustic stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 27614459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Excitability of the pathways mediating the startle reaction before execution of a voluntary movement.
    Kumru H; Valls-Solé J
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 16273394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sub-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied after the go-signal facilitates reaction time under control but not startle conditions.
    Smith V; Carlsen AN
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 47(4):333-345. PubMed ID: 29356214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reaction time and acoustic startle in normal human subjects.
    Valls-Solé J; Solé A; Valldeoriola F; Muñoz E; Gonzalez LE; Tolosa ES
    Neurosci Lett; 1995 Aug; 195(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 7478277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of the startle response during upper limb stretch perturbations.
    Forgaard CJ; Franks IM; Maslovat D; Gowan NJ; Kim JC; Chua R
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():163-176. PubMed ID: 27664458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the StartReact Effect Apply to First-Trial Reactive Movements?
    Sutter K; Nonnekes J; Dibilio V; Geurts AC; Weerdesteyn V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153129. PubMed ID: 27077654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.
    Carlsen AN; Dakin CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 16874516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.
    Carlsen AN; Almeida QJ; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 217(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 22138667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Startle response is dishabituated during a reaction time task.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 152(4):510-8. PubMed ID: 12904937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Startle reveals an absence of advance motor programming in a Go/No-go task.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Dakin CJ; Sanderson DJ; Inglis JT; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18262355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.