421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25919803)
1. Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses.
Atri M; Tabatabaeifar L; Jang HJ; Finelli A; Moshonov H; Jewett M
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 25919803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of Renal Tumor Histotypes: Usefulness of Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Fan PL; Wang WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W335-42. PubMed ID: 26295670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Qualitative and quantitative MDCT features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other solid renal cortical masses.
Lee-Felker SA; Felker ER; Tan N; Margolis DJ; Young JR; Sayre J; Raman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W516-24. PubMed ID: 25341166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT.
Zhang J; Lefkowitz RA; Ishill NM; Wang L; Moskowitz CS; Russo P; Eisenberg H; Hricak H
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):494-504. PubMed ID: 17641370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential diagnosis of nonpalpable testicular lesions: qualitative and quantitative contrast-enhanced US of benign and malignant testicular tumors.
Isidori AM; Pozza C; Gianfrilli D; Giannetta E; Lemma A; Pofi R; Barbagallo F; Manganaro L; Martino G; Lombardo F; Cantisani V; Franco G; Lenzi A
Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):606-18. PubMed ID: 24968192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes--correlation with pathologic findings.
Sun MR; Ngo L; Genega EM; Atkins MB; Finn ME; Rofsky NM; Pedrosa I
Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):793-802. PubMed ID: 19244046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Wei SP; Xu CL; Zhang Q; Zhang QR; Zhao YE; Huang PF; Xie YD; Zhou CS; Tian FL; Yang B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2135-2145. PubMed ID: 28331942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Taouli B; Thakur RK; Mannelli L; Babb JS; Kim S; Hecht EM; Lee VS; Israel GM
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):398-407. PubMed ID: 19276322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complex cystic renal masses: characterization with contrast-enhanced US.
Ascenti G; Mazziotti S; Zimbaro G; Settineri N; Magno C; Melloni D; Caruso R; Scribano E
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 17392251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exophytic renal masses: angular interface with renal parenchyma for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions at MR imaging.
Verma SK; Mitchell DG; Yang R; Roth CG; O'Kane P; Verma M; Parker L
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 20160001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging.
Hecht EM; Israel GM; Krinsky GA; Hahn WY; Kim DC; Belitskaya-Levy I; Lee VS
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 15215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative enhancement washout analysis of solid cortical renal masses using multidetector computed tomography.
Shebel HM; Elsayes KM; Sheir KZ; Abou El Atta HM; El-Sherbiny AF; Ellis JH; El-Diasty TA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 21586926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions using CT-based radiomics and machine learning: comparison with radiologist interpretation.
Wentland AL; Yamashita R; Kino A; Pandit P; Shen L; Brooke Jeffrey R; Rubin D; Kamaya A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Feb; 48(2):642-648. PubMed ID: 36370180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of indeterminate renal masses with contrast-enhanced US: a diagnostic performance study.
Barr RG; Peterson C; Hindi A
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 24475802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of multiphasic contrast-enhanced MR textures in differentiating small renal mass subtypes.
Hoang UN; Mojdeh Mirmomen S; Meirelles O; Yao J; Merino M; Metwalli A; Marston Linehan W; Malayeri AA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Dec; 43(12):3400-3409. PubMed ID: 29858935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiologic-Radiomic Machine Learning Models for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses: Comparison With Expert-Level Radiologists.
Sun XY; Feng QX; Xu X; Zhang J; Zhu FP; Yang YH; Zhang YD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):W44-W54. PubMed ID: 31553660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Homogeneous T1 Hyperintense Renal Lesions with Smooth Borders: Is Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Needed?
Davarpanah AH; Spektor M; Mathur M; Israel GM
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 26919441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
