These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25919886)

  • 41. Force field development and simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Huang J; MacKerell AD
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Feb; 48():40-48. PubMed ID: 29080468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How multisite phosphorylation impacts the conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Jin F; Gräter F
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 May; 17(5):e1008939. PubMed ID: 33945530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Personal Precise Force Field for Intrinsically Disordered and Ordered Proteins Based on Deep Learning.
    Ji X; Liu H; Zhang Y; Chen J; Chen HF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Jan; 63(1):362-374. PubMed ID: 36533639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Structures of the intrinsically disordered Aβ, tau and α-synuclein proteins in aqueous solution from computer simulations.
    Nguyen PH; Derreumaux P
    Biophys Chem; 2020 Sep; 264():106421. PubMed ID: 32623047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. To be disordered or not to be disordered: is that still a question for proteins in the cell?
    Pauwels K; Lebrun P; Tompa P
    Cell Mol Life Sci; 2017 Sep; 74(17):3185-3204. PubMed ID: 28612216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Probing the dynamics of disorder.
    Fox SJ; Kannan S
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2017 Sep; 128():57-62. PubMed ID: 28554553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quality of force fields and sampling methods in simulating pepX peptides: a case study for intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Wang A; Peng X; Li Y; Zhang D; Zhang Z; Li G
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Jan; 23(3):2430-2437. PubMed ID: 33459730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Structural Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Depend Strongly on Force Field: A Comparison to Experiment.
    Rauscher S; Gapsys V; Gajda MJ; Zweckstetter M; de Groot BL; Grubmüller H
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Nov; 11(11):5513-24. PubMed ID: 26574339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Local and Global Dynamics in Intrinsically Disordered Synuclein.
    Rezaei-Ghaleh N; Parigi G; Soranno A; Holla A; Becker S; Schuler B; Luchinat C; Zweckstetter M
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2018 Nov; 57(46):15262-15266. PubMed ID: 30184304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Full structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins from unbiased molecular dynamics simulations.
    Shrestha UR; Smith JC; Petridis L
    Commun Biol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):243. PubMed ID: 33623120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Current Stage and Future Perspectives for Homology Modeling, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, Machine Learning with Molecular Dynamics, and Quantum Computing for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Proteins with Intrinsically Disordered Regions.
    Coskuner-Weber O; Uversky VN
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2024; 25(2):163-171. PubMed ID: 38275091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Direct detection of carbon and nitrogen nuclei for high-resolution analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins using NMR spectroscopy.
    Gibbs EB; Kriwacki RW
    Methods; 2018 Apr; 138-139():39-46. PubMed ID: 29341926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) in trypanosomatids.
    de Cássia Ruy P; Torrieri R; Toledo JS; de Souza Alves V; Cruz AK; Ruiz JC
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1100. PubMed ID: 25496281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contribution of proline to the pre-structuring tendency of transient helical secondary structure elements in intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Lee C; Kalmar L; Xue B; Tompa P; Daughdrill GW; Uversky VN; Han KH
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 Mar; 1840(3):993-1003. PubMed ID: 24211251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins from NMR chemical shifts.
    Kragelj J; Ozenne V; Blackledge M; Jensen MR
    Chemphyschem; 2013 Sep; 14(13):3034-45. PubMed ID: 23794453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modulation of Correlated Segment Fluctuations in IDPs upon Complex Formation as an Allosteric Regulatory Mechanism.
    Beier A; Schwarz TC; Kurzbach D; Platzer G; Tribuzio F; Konrat R
    J Mol Biol; 2018 Aug; 430(16):2439-2452. PubMed ID: 29733855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Computer Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Chong SH; Chatterjee P; Ham S
    Annu Rev Phys Chem; 2017 May; 68():117-134. PubMed ID: 28226222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Using Dimensionality Reduction to Systematically Expand Conformational Sampling of Intrinsically Disordered Peptides.
    Kukharenko O; Sawade K; Steuer J; Peter C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Oct; 12(10):4726-4734. PubMed ID: 27588692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
    Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Analyzing IDPs in Interactomes.
    Uversky VN
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2141():895-945. PubMed ID: 32696395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.