These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25920853)

  • 1. Structure in time-frequency binary masking errors and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Kressner AA; Rozell CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):2025-35. PubMed ID: 25920853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome measures based on classification performance fail to predict the intelligibility of binary-masked speech.
    Kressner AA; May T; Rozell CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3033. PubMed ID: 27369123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implant speech intelligibility outcomes with structured and unstructured binary mask errors.
    Kressner AA; Westermann A; Buchholz JM; Rozell CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):800-10. PubMed ID: 26936562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the importance of time-frequency contributions to speech intelligibility in noise.
    Yu C; Wójcicki KK; Loizou PC; Hansen JH; Johnson MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):3007-16. PubMed ID: 24815280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ideal quantized mask to increase intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Healy EW; Vasko JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1392. PubMed ID: 30424638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: dependency on signal-to-noise ratios.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):531-9. PubMed ID: 22280614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1673-82. PubMed ID: 18345855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
    Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of vocal and demographic traits on speech intelligibility over bone conduction.
    Pollard KA; Tran PK; Letowski T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):2060-9. PubMed ID: 25920856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of low-pass filtering on intelligibility of periodically interrupted speech.
    Bhargava P; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):EL87-92. PubMed ID: 22352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.