These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25920855)
1. Separable spectro-temporal Gabor filter bank features: Reducing the complexity of robust features for automatic speech recognition. Schädler MR; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):2047-59. PubMed ID: 25920855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spectro-temporal modulation subspace-spanning filter bank features for robust automatic speech recognition. Schädler M; Meyer BT; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4134-51. PubMed ID: 22559385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception. Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectro-temporal modulation energy based mask for robust speaker identification. Chi TS; Lin TH; Hsu CC J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):EL368-74. PubMed ID: 22559454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do we need STRFs for cocktail parties? On the relevance of physiologically motivated features for human speech perception derived from automatic speech recognition. Kollmeier B; Schädler MR; Meyer A; Anemüller J; Meyer BT Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():333-41. PubMed ID: 23716239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes. Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory motivated front-end for noisy speech using spectro-temporal modulation filtering. Ganapathy S; Omar M J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):EL343-9. PubMed ID: 25373991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics of spectro-temporal modulation frequency selectivity in humans. Oetjen A; Verhey JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1887. PubMed ID: 28372116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonlinear spectro-temporal features based on a cochlear model for automatic speech recognition in a noisy situation. Choi YS; Lee SY Neural Netw; 2013 Sep; 45():62-9. PubMed ID: 23558292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computational speech segregation based on an auditory-inspired modulation analysis. May T; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3350. PubMed ID: 25480079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectral and Temporal Envelope Cues for Human and Automatic Speech Recognition in Noise. Hu G; Determan SC; Dong Y; Beeve AT; Collins JE; Gai Y J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 21(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 31758279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A model of auditory perception as front end for automatic speech recognition. Tchorz J; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2040-50. PubMed ID: 10530027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility. Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]