311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25921078)
1. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries.
van Dyk M; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25921078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Newborn hearing screening at a community-based obstetric unit: Screening and diagnostic outcomes.
de Kock T; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 84():124-31. PubMed ID: 27063767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of technology choice on service provision for universal newborn hearing screening within a busy district hospital.
Iley KL; Addis RJ
J Perinatol; 2000 Dec; 20(8 Pt 2):S122-7. PubMed ID: 11190692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal hearing screening - does failure in TEOAE screening matter when the AABR test is passed?
Gellrich D; Gröger M; Echternach M; Eder K; Huber P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 37831131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Newborn hearing screening].
Babac S; Djerić D; Ivanković Z
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2007; 135(5-6):264-8. PubMed ID: 17633310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program.
Lemons J; Fanaroff A; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Murray G; Diefendorf A
J Perinatol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11896516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China.
Sheng H; Zhou Q; Wang Q; Yu Y; Liu L; Liang M; Zhou X; Wu H; Tang X; Huang Z
Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():655625. PubMed ID: 34055691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions].
Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols.
Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA
Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate.
Ngui LX; Tang IP; Prepageran N; Lai ZW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 120():184-188. PubMed ID: 30844634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining concordance and cost impact of otoacoustic emission and automated auditory brainstem response in newborn hearing screening in a tertiary hospital.
Ong KMC; Rivera AS; Chan AL; Chiong CM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 128():109704. PubMed ID: 31606683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving newborn hearing screening: Are automated auditory brainstem response ear inserts an effective option?
Chan KT; Wong EC; Law CW; Chong HM; McPherson B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1920-5. PubMed ID: 26412459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response in the same ear of the babies in neonatal unit.
Abdul Wahid SN; Md Daud MK; Sidek D; Abd Rahman N; Mansor S; Zakaria MN
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1366-9. PubMed ID: 22770594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
