These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25921078)
1. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries. van Dyk M; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25921078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why. Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening? Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns. Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements. Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Newborn hearing screening at a community-based obstetric unit: Screening and diagnostic outcomes. de Kock T; Swanepoel D; Hall JW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 84():124-31. PubMed ID: 27063767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of technology choice on service provision for universal newborn hearing screening within a busy district hospital. Iley KL; Addis RJ J Perinatol; 2000 Dec; 20(8 Pt 2):S122-7. PubMed ID: 11190692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal hearing screening - does failure in TEOAE screening matter when the AABR test is passed? Gellrich D; Gröger M; Echternach M; Eder K; Huber P Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 37831131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program. Lemons J; Fanaroff A; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Murray G; Diefendorf A J Perinatol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11896516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols. Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China. Sheng H; Zhou Q; Wang Q; Yu Y; Liu L; Liang M; Zhou X; Wu H; Tang X; Huang Z Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():655625. PubMed ID: 34055691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions]. Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols. Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate. Ngui LX; Tang IP; Prepageran N; Lai ZW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 120():184-188. PubMed ID: 30844634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining concordance and cost impact of otoacoustic emission and automated auditory brainstem response in newborn hearing screening in a tertiary hospital. Ong KMC; Rivera AS; Chan AL; Chiong CM Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 128():109704. PubMed ID: 31606683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving newborn hearing screening: Are automated auditory brainstem response ear inserts an effective option? Chan KT; Wong EC; Law CW; Chong HM; McPherson B Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1920-5. PubMed ID: 26412459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response in the same ear of the babies in neonatal unit. Abdul Wahid SN; Md Daud MK; Sidek D; Abd Rahman N; Mansor S; Zakaria MN Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1366-9. PubMed ID: 22770594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]