These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1054 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25921313)

  • 1. Gene protein detection platform--a comparison of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay with conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization platforms.
    Stålhammar G; Farrajota P; Olsson A; Silva C; Hartman J; Elmberger G
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2015 Aug; 19(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 25921313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
    Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A gene-protein assay for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2): brightfield tricolor visualization of HER2 protein, the HER2 gene, and chromosome 17 centromere (CEN17) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue sections.
    Nitta H; Kelly BD; Padilla M; Wick N; Brunhoeber P; Bai I; Singh S; Ranger-Moore J; Bieniarz C; Tsuda H; Grogan TM
    Diagn Pathol; 2012 May; 7():60. PubMed ID: 22647525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
    Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.
    Shah SS; Ketterling RP; Goetz MP; Ingle JN; Reynolds CA; Perez EA; Chen B
    Hum Pathol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 19762065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation and workflow optimization of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing using INFORM HER2 dual-color in situ hybridization.
    Lim SJ; Cantillep A; Carpenter PM
    Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2590-6. PubMed ID: 24075600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Updates on HER2 Assessment in Breast Cancer With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry Results With Focus on Cases With
    Hoda RS; Brogi E; Xu J; Ventura K; Ross DS; Dang C; Robson M; Norton L; Morrow M; Wen HY
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 May; 144(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 31647316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastroesophageal cancer: correlation between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Tafe LJ; Janjigian YY; Zaidinski M; Hedvat CV; Hameed MR; Tang LH; Hicks JB; Shah MA; Barbashina V
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1460-5. PubMed ID: 22032573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
    Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
    Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
    Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinicopathologic Features of 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Group 3 Breast Carcinoma (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Chromosome 17 Centromere Ratio <2.0 and Average Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Copy Number ≥6.0).
    Wilcock D; Sirohi D; Albertson D; Cleary AS; Coleman JF; Jedrzkiewicz J; Mahlow J; Ruano AL; Gulbahce HE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2024 Aug; 148(8):890-897. PubMed ID: 37934954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bright-field HER2 dual in situ hybridization (DISH) assay vs fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): focused study of immunohistochemical 2+ cases.
    Gao FF; Dabbs DJ; Cooper KL; Bhargava R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jan; 141(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 24343743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Partial Weak Staining in Normal Breast Epithelium on the Reliability of Immunohistochemistry Results in HercepTest-positive Breast Cancer.
    Farra C; Fedda F; Tfayli A; Tawil A; Zaatari G; Ashkar H; Issa G; Boulos F
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):340-344. PubMed ID: 31213407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Assessment of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: a comparison of dual-color in-situ hybridization and fluorescence in-situ hybridization].
    Xu Y; Yang W; Yang F; Lu Y; Cai X; Zhou X
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 43(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 24915811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PGDS, a novel technique combining chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the assessment of ErbB2 (HER2/neu) status in breast cancer.
    Ni R; Mulligan AM; Have C; O'Malley FP
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2007 Sep; 15(3):316-24. PubMed ID: 17721278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization-based comparison between the Oracle HER2 Bond Immunohistochemical System, Dako HercepTest, and Vysis PathVysion HER2 FISH using both commercially validated and modified ASCO/CAP and United Kingdom HER2 IHC scoring guidelines.
    O'Grady A; Allen D; Happerfield L; Johnson N; Provenzano E; Pinder SE; Tee L; Gu M; Kay EW
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 20661132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual HER2 gene protein assay: focused study of breast cancers with 2+ immunohistochemical expression.
    Li Z; Dabbs DJ; Cooper KL; Bhargava R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Mar; 143(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 25696805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP evaluation systems for HER2 amplification in breast cancer.
    Pu X; Shi J; Li Z; Feng A; Ye Q
    Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Jun; 211(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 25818873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in primary breast cancer in the era of standardized testing: a Canadian prospective study.
    Hanna WM; Barnes PJ; Chang MC; Gilks CB; Magliocco AM; Rees H; Quenneville L; Robertson SJ; SenGupta SK; Nofech-Mozes S
    J Clin Oncol; 2014 Dec; 32(35):3967-73. PubMed ID: 25385731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of repeat HER2 testing after initial equivocal HER2 FISH results using 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines.
    Xu FP; Wang K; Xu J; Chen J; Zhang YF; Wu HM; Zhang MH; Long XX; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Lin DY; Liu YH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):757-764. PubMed ID: 28861637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.