103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2592152)
1. Cephalometric changes in Angle Class II treatment.
Fischer-Brandies H
Int J Orthod; 1989; 27(3-4):9-13. PubMed ID: 2592152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
Demirović D; Filipović M
Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of results in Class II, division 1 malocclusions treated by bionator].
Yiğit MD; Akin SZ
Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 2489153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Realities of craniofacial growth modification.
Kluemper GT; Spalding PM
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):23-51. PubMed ID: 11905336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
Shell TL; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Leon-Salazar V; Leon-Salazar R; Janson M; de Freitas MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):154.e1-10; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 19651339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cephalometric evaluation of the dental and facial-skeletal effects using the Bionator with stepwise protrusive activations.
Kumar S; Sidhu SS; Kharbanda OP
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 20(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 8619967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical versus orthodontic correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adolescents: effects and indications.
Proffit WR; Phillips C; Tulloch JF; Medland PH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(4):209-20. PubMed ID: 1298780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
