102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2592152)
21. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The stimulation of the rotation of the mandible with Angle Class II/1 and II/2 malocclusion with functional regulators and activators as compared to the control group].
Stüber P
Stomatol DDR; 1990 Mar; 40(3):112-4. PubMed ID: 2284653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of treatment results with the edgewise and the Begg approach.
Papaioannou-Maragou O; Papaioannou A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 19(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 7865419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of activator treatment changes.
Hashim HA
Aust Orthod J; 1991 Oct; 12(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 1843791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
Aslan BI; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Cephalometric evaluation of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion cases treated with the Bimler appliance].
Calegari MA; Petrelli E; Rodrigues AM
Dens (Curitiba); 1990; 6(1-2):16-24. PubMed ID: 2131271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sagittal and vertical changes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion according to the Cetlin method.
Ferro F; Monsurró A; Perillo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 10935955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Evaluation of results in Class II: division 1 malocclusions by treated Frankel appliance].
Yiğit MD; Akin SZ
Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 2489152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of early activator treatment in patients with class II malocclusion evaluated by thin-plate spline analysis.
Lux CJ; Rübel J; Starke J; Conradt C; Stellzig PA; Komposch PG
Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 11302588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Results of a comparative study of skeletal anomaly Class II cases after activator, headgear and combined headgear-activator treatment].
Papadopoulos MA; Rakosi T
Hell Stomatol Chron; 1990; 34(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 2130044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The changes in orthodontic area after retention period in skeletal Class 2 cases treated with activator].
Uner O; Gültan AS
Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 2489149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Glossoplasty: hope and pre-orthodontic support?].
Raberin M; Busson E
Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():455-68. PubMed ID: 1341732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Ruf S; Baltromejus S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2001 Feb; 71(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11211297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [A retrospective study of morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
Li Q; Zheng Z; Bai D; Pang G
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 17(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 12539381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients.
Franchi L; Baccetti T
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):950-4. PubMed ID: 17090170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
