These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25921652)

  • 1. The attractive lip: A photomorphometric analysis.
    Penna V; Fricke A; Iblher N; Eisenhardt SU; Stark GB
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 25921652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships between facial features in the perception of profile attractiveness.
    Torsello F; Graci M; Grande NM; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 20974445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Variation in the assessment of facial aesthetics of women during the past 150 years].
    Kuitert RB; Aydin B
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2020 Dec; 127(12):683-689. PubMed ID: 33367295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the frontal esthetic preferences in the lower facial portion of Koreans and Caucasians.
    Kang YG; Lee YH; Kook YA; Kim SH; Sinclair PM
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19582252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences between Caucasian and Asian attractive faces.
    Rhee SC
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 28722243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults.
    Farkas LG; Katic MJ; Hreczko TA; Deutsch C; Munro IR
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 6588760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anthropometry and Current Aesthetic Concept of the Lower Third of the Face and Lips in Caucasian Adult Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Winiarska N; Stachura A; Roszkowski B; Pietruski P; Włodarski P; Paskal W
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Jul; 48(13):2353-2364. PubMed ID: 38467850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of soft tissue facial profile in white males.
    Zylinski CG; Nanda RS; Kapila S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 1598891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of preferred lip position according to different tip rotations of the nose in class I young adult subjects.
    Feghali J; Khoury E; Souccar NM; Akl R; Ghoubril J
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 31231000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perception of lip aesthetics in the context of facial proportions-An eye-tracking-based analysis.
    Kempa J; Alfertshofer M; Swift A; Green JB; Antoszewski B; Timler W; Cotofana S; Kasielska-Trojan A
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2024 Aug; 38(8):1606-1617. PubMed ID: 38084783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
    Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft tissue profile analysis in a sample of South African Blacks with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P
    SADJ; 2007 Jun; 62(5):206, 208-10, 212. PubMed ID: 17886588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.