241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25922127)
1. Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
López-Alonso V; Fernández-Del-Olmo M; Costantini A; Gonzalez-Henriquez JJ; Cheeran B
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Dec; 126(12):2342-7. PubMed ID: 25922127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.
Ammann C; Lindquist MA; Celnik PA
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):757-763. PubMed ID: 28420581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.
Chew T; Ho KA; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five anodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 24hours.
Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Feb; 49(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 30635162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms.
López-Alonso V; Cheeran B; Río-Rodríguez D; Fernández-Del-Olmo M
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 24630849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability.
Christova M; Rafolt D; Gallasch E
Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():27-33. PubMed ID: 25804362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults.
Pourmajidian M; Lauber B; Sidhu SK
Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan; 714():134597. PubMed ID: 31689457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
Ho KA; Taylor JL; Loo CK
J ECT; 2015 Mar; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25010032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facilitatory non-invasive brain stimulation in older adults: the effect of stimulation type and duration on the induction of motor cortex plasticity.
Puri R; Hinder MR; Canty AJ; Summers JJ
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Dec; 234(12):3411-3423. PubMed ID: 27450080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: Conventional versus high-definition montages.
Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Neurosci Res; 2021 May; 166():12-25. PubMed ID: 32610058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. tDCS over posterior parietal cortex increases cortical excitability but decreases learning: An ERPs and TMS-EEG study.
Grasso PA; Tonolli E; Bortoletto M; Miniussi C
Brain Res; 2021 Feb; 1753():147227. PubMed ID: 33385376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A single session of 1 mA anodal tDCS-supported motor training does not improve motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Meesen RL; Thijs H; Leenus DJ; Cuypers K
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 24169364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Duration but not intensity influences transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) after-effects on cortical excitability.
Vignaud P; Mondino M; Poulet E; Palm U; Brunelin J
Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 29482881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex.
Liu ML; Karabanov AN; Piek M; Petersen ET; Thielscher A; Siebner HR
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9580. PubMed ID: 35688875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
