These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25922886)

  • 1. International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests. ICRA Working Group on Multilingual Speech Tests.
    Akeroyd MA; Arlinger S; Bentler RA; Boothroyd A; Dillier N; Dreschler WA; Gagné JP; Lutman M; Wouters J; Wong L; Kollmeier B;
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():17-22. PubMed ID: 25922886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review.
    Kollmeier B; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Zokoll MA; Uslar V; Brand T; Wagener KC
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():3-16. PubMed ID: 26383182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overcoming language barriers: Matrix sentence tests with closed speech corpora.
    Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():1-2. PubMed ID: 26365793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
    Warzybok A; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Lenarz T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():80-7. PubMed ID: 26364512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The German hearing in noise test with a female talker: development and comparison with German male speech test.
    Mönnich AL; Strieth S; Bohnert A; Ernst BP; Rader T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3157-3169. PubMed ID: 36635424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
    Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Brand T; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of the Dutch matrix test by random selection of sentences from a preselected subset.
    Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2015 May; 19():. PubMed ID: 25964195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment on 'International collegium of rehabilitative audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests', by Akeroyd et al.
    Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):268-9. PubMed ID: 26903088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics1.
    Zokoll MA; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Wagener KC; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 23800814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of a mixed gender, multi-talker matrix sentence test in Australian English.
    Kelly H; Lin G; Sankaran N; Xia J; Kalluri S; Carlile S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Feb; 56(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 27758153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
    Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.