BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25922942)

  • 1. Misunderstanding of Front-Of-Package Nutrition Information on US Food Products.
    Miller LM; Cassady DL; Beckett LA; Applegate EA; Wilson MD; Gibson TN; Ellwood K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125306. PubMed ID: 25922942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nutrition Label Viewing during a Food-Selection Task: Front-of-Package Labels vs Nutrition Facts Labels.
    Graham DJ; Heidrick C; Hodgin K
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Oct; 115(10):1636-46. PubMed ID: 25887785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To See or Not to See: Do Front of Pack Nutrition Labels Affect Attention to Overall Nutrition Information?
    Bix L; Sundar RP; Bello NM; Peltier C; Weatherspoon LJ; Becker MW
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139732. PubMed ID: 26488611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting visual attention to nutrition information on food products: the influence of motivation and ability.
    Turner MM; Skubisz C; Pandya SP; Silverman M; Austin LL
    J Health Commun; 2014 Sep; 19(9):1017-29. PubMed ID: 24555542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of front-of-pack nutrition symbols: a pilot study with consumers.
    Emrich TE; Mendoza JE; L'Abbé MR
    Can J Diet Pract Res; 2012; 73(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 23217449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does front-of-pack nutrition information improve consumer ability to make healthful choices? Performance of warnings and the traffic light system in a simulated shopping experiment.
    Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():55-62. PubMed ID: 29102533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioural effects of directive cues on front-of-package nutrition information: the combination matters!
    Koenigstorfer J; Wąsowicz-Kiryło G; Styśko-Kunkowska M; Groeppel-Klein A
    Public Health Nutr; 2014 Sep; 17(9):2115-21. PubMed ID: 23954043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.
    Kelly B; Hughes C; Chapman K; Louie JC; Dixon H; Crawford J; King L; Daube M; Slevin T
    Health Promot Int; 2009 Jun; 24(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 19336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When zero is greater than one: consumer misinterpretations of nutrition labels.
    Graham DJ; Mohr GS
    Health Psychol; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1579-87. PubMed ID: 24707845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvements in recall and food choices using a graphical method to deliver information of select nutrients.
    Pratt NS; Ellison BD; Benjamin AS; Nakamura MT
    Nutr Res; 2016 Jan; 36(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 26773780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nutrient-specific system versus full fact panel: Testing the benefits of nutrient-specific front-of-package labels in a student sample.
    Carter KA; González-Vallejo C
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():512-526. PubMed ID: 29518468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of front-of-package labels on consumer product evaluation and preferences.
    Oswald C; Adhikari K; Mohan A
    Curr Res Food Sci; 2022; 5():131-140. PubMed ID: 35036933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the Impact of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Proposed Nutrition Facts Label Changes on Young Adults' Visual Attention and Purchase Intentions.
    Graham DJ; Roberto CA
    Health Educ Behav; 2016 Aug; 43(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 27230269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of nutrition labels and advertising claims in altering consumers' evaluation and choice.
    Bialkova S; Sasse L; Fenko A
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():38-46. PubMed ID: 26341955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The new food label, type of fat, and consumer choice. A pilot study.
    Hrovat KB; Harris KZ; Leach AD; Russell BS; Harris BV; Sprecher DL
    Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):690-5. PubMed ID: 7952255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ignorance is bliss. How parents of preschool children make sense of front-of-package visuals and claims on food.
    Abrams KM; Evans C; Duff BR
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():20-9. PubMed ID: 25510529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Front-of-package references to fiber on foods in Canadian supermarkets highlight the need for increased nutrition knowledge among consumers.
    Sacco JE; Sumanac D; Tarasuk V
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2013; 45(6):518-24. PubMed ID: 23726892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.