These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25922942)

  • 41. Food product design: emerging evidence for food policy.
    Al-Hamdani M; Smith S
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2017 Mar; 68(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 27580635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Innovative AI methods for monitoring front-of-package information: A case study on infant foods.
    Kim D; Kim SY; Yoo R; Choo J; Yang H
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303083. PubMed ID: 38753840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Impact of Disclosure of Nutrition Information on Consumers' Behavioral Intention in Korea.
    Choi J
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2015; 34(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 25826204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Consumer knowledge and attitudes about genetically modified food products and labelling policy.
    Vecchione M; Feldman C; Wunderlich S
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2015 May; 66(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 25519248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers' choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking.
    Bialkova S; Grunert KG; Juhl HJ; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; van Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2014 May; 76():66-75. PubMed ID: 24503332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of Interpretation Aids on Attentional Capture, Visual Processing, and Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels.
    Antúnez L; Giménez A; Maiche A; Ares G
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2015; 47(4):292-9.e1. PubMed ID: 25878027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does green mean healthy? Nutrition label color affects perceptions of healthfulness.
    Schuldt JP
    Health Commun; 2013; 28(8):814-21. PubMed ID: 23444895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition labeling program: rationale and development of the nutrition criteria.
    Lupton JR; Balentine DA; Black RM; Hildwine R; Ivens BJ; Kennedy ET; Packard PT; Sperber BR; Steffen D; Story M
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2010 Apr; 91(4):1078S-1089S. PubMed ID: 20181813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A randomized trial of calorie labeling on menus.
    Hammond D; Goodman S; Hanning R; Daniel S
    Prev Med; 2013 Dec; 57(6):860-6. PubMed ID: 24113263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Study on knowledge, attitudes and use of the pre-packaged food nutrition labeling in Hangzhou supermarket consumers in 2010].
    Hong ZH; Wang SF; Liu M; Yang YP; Chen Y; Liu QM; Ren YJ; Lü J; Li LM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jul; 32(7):657-60. PubMed ID: 21933533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Consumer perceptions of specific design characteristics for front-of-package nutrition labels.
    Acton RB; Vanderlee L; Roberto CA; Hammond D
    Health Educ Res; 2018 Apr; 33(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 29514225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Attention to Physical Activity-Equivalent Calorie Information on Nutrition Facts Labels: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.
    Wolfson JA; Graham DJ; Bleich SN
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2017 Jan; 49(1):35-42.e1. PubMed ID: 27865642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Calories in Context: Conceptual Metaphors and Consumers' Perception and Use of Calorie Information.
    Bayliss LC; Krieger JL
    J Health Commun; 2018; 23(8):783-790. PubMed ID: 30300072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Counter-advertising may reduce parent's susceptibility to front-of-package promotions on unhealthy foods.
    Dixon H; Scully M; Kelly B; Donovan R; Chapman K; Wakefield M
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2014; 46(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 25034347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Making healthy food choices using nutrition facts panels. The roles of knowledge, motivation, dietary modifications goals, and age.
    Miller LM; Cassady DL
    Appetite; 2012 Aug; 59(1):129-39. PubMed ID: 22524999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Nutrition marketing on food labels.
    Colby SE; Johnson L; Scheett A; Hoverson B
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2010; 42(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 20096635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An objective measure of nutrition facts panel usage and nutrient quality of food choice.
    Nelson D; Graham D; Harnack L
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2014; 46(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 24973021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Consumer awareness of salt and sodium reduction and sodium labeling.
    Kim MK; Lopetcharat K; Gerard PD; Drake MA
    J Food Sci; 2012 Sep; 77(9):S307-13. PubMed ID: 22957915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Consumer understanding and use of food and nutrition labeling in Turkey.
    Besler HT; Buyuktuncer Z; Uyar MF
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2012; 44(6):584-91. PubMed ID: 22770836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Signalling product healthiness through symbolic package cues: Effects of package shape and goal congruence on consumer behaviour.
    van Ooijen I; Fransen ML; Verlegh PWJ; Smit EG
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():73-82. PubMed ID: 27866987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.