These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25922942)

  • 61. Consumer understanding and use of food and nutrition labeling in Turkey.
    Besler HT; Buyuktuncer Z; Uyar MF
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2012; 44(6):584-91. PubMed ID: 22770836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Signalling product healthiness through symbolic package cues: Effects of package shape and goal congruence on consumer behaviour.
    van Ooijen I; Fransen ML; Verlegh PWJ; Smit EG
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():73-82. PubMed ID: 27866987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: a consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling.
    Hodgkins C; Barnett J; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; Gulcan Y; Kustepeli Y; Akgungor S; Chryssochoidis G; Fernández-Celemin L; Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann S; Gibbs M; Raats M
    Appetite; 2012 Dec; 59(3):806-17. PubMed ID: 22918174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Consumer valuation of packaged foods. Interactive effects of amount and accessibility of information.
    Kimura A; Wada Y; Tsuzuki D; Goto S; Cai D; Dan I
    Appetite; 2008 Nov; 51(3):628-34. PubMed ID: 18597891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling in India.
    Pande R; Gavaravarapu SM; Kulkarni B
    Lancet Public Health; 2020 Apr; 5(4):e195. PubMed ID: 32243851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A review of nutrition labeling and food choice in the United States.
    Dumoitier A; Abbo V; Neuhofer ZT; McFadden BR
    Obes Sci Pract; 2019 Dec; 5(6):581-591. PubMed ID: 31890249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Nutrition information and front-of-pack labelling: issues in effectiveness.
    Hieke S; Harris JL
    Public Health Nutr; 2016 Aug; 19(12):2103-5. PubMed ID: 27503674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Perspective in statements of quantity, with implications for consumer psychology.
    Sanford AJ; Fay N; Stewart A; Moxey L
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Mar; 13(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11933996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The effects of nutrition knowledge on food label use. A review of the literature.
    Miller LM; Cassady DL
    Appetite; 2015 Sep; 92():207-16. PubMed ID: 26025086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.
    Cecchini M; Warin L
    Obes Rev; 2016 Mar; 17(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 26693944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Front-of-Package Protein Labels on Cereal Create Health Halos.
    McKeon GP; Hallman WK
    Foods; 2024 Apr; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 38672812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Consumer confusion about wholegrain content and healthfulness in product labels: a discrete choice experiment and comprehension assessment.
    Wilde P; Pomeranz JL; Lizewski LJ; Zhang FF
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 Dec; 23(18):3324-3331. PubMed ID: 32773004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A randomized controlled trial examining consumers' perceptions and opinions on using different versions of a FoodFlip© smartphone application for delivery of nutrition information.
    Ahmed M; Oh A; Vanderlee L; Franco-Arellano B; Schermel A; Lou W; L'Abbé MR
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Feb; 17(1):22. PubMed ID: 32050996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The relationship between nutrition reading and label use and nutrition knowledge amongst a sample of rural youth studying at a university in South Africa.
    Xazela N; Chinyamurindi WT; Shava H
    Health SA; 2019; 24():1320. PubMed ID: 31934443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Consumers' opinions on warning labels on food packages: A qualitative study in Brazil.
    de Morais Sato P; Mais LA; Khandpur N; Ulian MD; Bortoletto Martins AP; Garcia MT; Spinillo CG; Urquizar Rojas CF; Jaime PC; Scagliusi FB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218813. PubMed ID: 31242235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Assessment of an e-training tool for college students to improve accuracy and reduce effort associated with reading nutrition labels.
    Soederberg Miller LM; Sutter C; Wilson MD; Bergman JJ; Beckett LA; Gibson TN
    J Am Coll Health; 2019 Jul; 67(5):441-448. PubMed ID: 29979929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Examining the Nutritional Quality of Canadian Packaged Foods and Beverages with and without Nutrition Claims.
    Franco-Arellano B; Labonté MÈ; Bernstein JT; L'Abbé MR
    Nutrients; 2018 Jun; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 29954102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Warnings as a directive front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme: comparison with the Guideline Daily Amount and traffic-light systems.
    Arrúa A; Machín L; Curutchet MR; Martínez J; Antúnez L; Alcaire F; Giménez A; Ares G
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Sep; 20(13):2308-2317. PubMed ID: 28625228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Is the calorie concept a real solution to the obesity epidemic?
    Camacho S; Ruppel A
    Glob Health Action; 2017; 10(1):1289650. PubMed ID: 28485680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Developing Nutrition Label Reading Skills: A Web-Based Practice Approach.
    Miller LM; Beckett LA; Bergman JJ; Wilson MD; Applegate EA; Gibson TN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):e16. PubMed ID: 28087497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.