135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25923152)
1. Prostate cancer: what about reproducibility of decision made at multidisciplinary team management?
Bayoud Y; Loock PY; Messaoudi R; Ripert T; Pierrevelcin J; Kozal S; Leon P; Kamdoum M; Irène C; Menard J
Urol J; 2015 Apr; 12(2):2078-82. PubMed ID: 25923152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging system to predict progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
May F; Hartung R; Breul J
BJU Int; 2001 Nov; 88(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 11890240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome.
Ward JF; Slezak JM; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
BJU Int; 2005 Apr; 95(6):751-6. PubMed ID: 15794776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome predictors of radical prostatectomy followed by adjuvant androgen deprivation in patients with clinical high risk prostate cancer and pT3 surgical margin positive disease.
Spahn M; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Kneitz B; Gontero P; Karnes JR; Schubert M; Montorsi F; Scholz CJ; Bader P; van Poppel H; Joniau S;
J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 22578727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of seminal vesicle involvement due to prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Algarra R; Barba J; Merino I; Tienza A; Tolosa E; Robles JE; Zudaire J
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Apr; 39(3):144-53. PubMed ID: 24996780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative assessment of the 1992 and 2002 pathologic T3 substages for the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Steuber T; Erbersdobler A; Graefen M; Haese A; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 16400637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The outcome of patients with pathological Gleason score >or=8 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez-Covarrubias F; Larre S; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17941921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy on Disease Progression and Adjuvant Treatment in Pathologically Localized Prostate Cancer.
Tomasković I; Milicić V; Tomić M; Ruzić B; Ulamec M
Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):697-700. PubMed ID: 26898068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Migration in last decade to high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Patard PM; Roumiguié M; Prudhomme T; Doumerc N; Thoulouzan M; Gamé X; de la Taille A; Rischmann P; Soulié M; Salomon L; Beauval JB
Prog Urol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 30337057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Perioperative parameters and prognosis analysis of patients aged 80 years or older treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer].
Zhang F; Zhang SD; Xiao CL; Huang Y; Ma LL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):822-827. PubMed ID: 30337742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term oncological outcomes of men undergoing radical prostatectomy with preoperative prostate-specific antigen <2.5 ng/ml and 2.5-4 ng/ml.
Qi P; Tsivian M; Abern MR; Bañez LL; Tang P; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1527-32. PubMed ID: 22795501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivatives, %p2PSA and prostate health index, predict pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M; Nava L; Lughezzani G; Larcher A; Scattoni V; Gadda GM; Bini V; Cestari A; Buffi NM; Freschi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 22078333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of prostate-specific antigen RNA before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy and transurethral resection of the prostate using "Light-Cycler"-based quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Straub B; Müller M; Krause H; Schrader M; Goessl C; Heicappell R; Miller K
Urology; 2001 Nov; 58(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 11711374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical prostatectomy. Prognostic value of positive surgical margins in pT2 patients.
Algarra R; Zudaire J; Tienza A; Velis JM; Merino I; Barba J; Tolosa E; Rincón A; Robles JE; Pascual I
Arch Esp Urol; 2013 Oct; 66(8):796-806. PubMed ID: 24136483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical study of prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a single center experience].
Taue R; Takahashi M; Fukawa T; Koizumi T; Nakanishi R; Yamaguchi K; Yamamoto Y; Nakatsuji H; Kishimoto T; Izaki H; Oka N; Fukumori T; Kanayama HO
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2009 Jan; 55(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19227203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
