These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Efficacy and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in Japanese men. Matsumoto K; Satoh T; Egawa S; Shimura S; Kuwao S; Baba S Int J Urol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 15948721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. Elshafei A; Kartha G; Li Y; S Moussa A; Hatem A; Gao T; Jones JS Prostate; 2014 Sep; 74(12):1183-8. PubMed ID: 24962004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection rate of anterior prostate cancer in 226 patients submitted to initial and repeat transperineal biopsy. Pepe P; Dibenedetto G; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F; Colecchia M; Aragona F Urol Int; 2014; 93(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 24776888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anterior prostate biopsy at initial and repeat evaluation: is it useful to detect significant prostate cancer? Pepe P; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(5):844-8. PubMed ID: 26689509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of additional "extreme" anterior apical needle biopsies in the initial detection of prostate cancer. Moussa AS; Meshref A; Schoenfield L; Masoud A; Abdel-Rahman S; Li J; Flazoura S; Magi-Galluzzi C; Fergany A; Fareed K; Jones JS Urology; 2010 May; 75(5):1034-9. PubMed ID: 20080294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of initial transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy to detect significant cancer. Takeshita H; Numao N; Kijima T; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Kawakami S; Yamamoto S; Yonese J; Fujii Y; Kihara K Int Urol Nephrol; 2013 Jun; 45(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 23529272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Ukimura O; Coleman JA; de la Taille A; Emberton M; Epstein JI; Freedland SJ; Giannarini G; Kibel AS; Montironi R; Ploussard G; Roobol MJ; Scattoni V; Jones JS Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):214-30. PubMed ID: 23021971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate biopsy: results and advantages of the transperineal approach--twenty-year experience of a single center. Pepe P; Aragona F World J Urol; 2014 Apr; 32(2):373-7. PubMed ID: 23743734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen. Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcome of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, targeting eight cores, for detecting prostate cancer in Japanese men. Ishimura T; Sakai I; Hara I; Eto H; Miyake H Int J Clin Oncol; 2004 Feb; 9(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 15162826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in men with previously negative prostate biopsy results. Lee SH; Chung MS; Kim JH; Oh YT; Rha KH; Chung BH J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):787-91. PubMed ID: 22122555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Length of prostate biopsy cores: does it impact cancer detection? Fiset PO; Aprikian A; Brimo F Can J Urol; 2013 Aug; 20(4):6848-53. PubMed ID: 23930611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates of various prostate biopsy methods for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of <10.0 ng/mL in real-world practice. Oh KT; Koo KC; Chung BH; Lee KS Investig Clin Urol; 2020 Jan; 61(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 31942460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How many cores should be taken in a repeat biopsy on patients in whom atypical small acinar proliferation has been identified in an initial transrectal prostate biopsy? Aglamis E; Kocaarslan R; Yucetas U; Toktas G; Ceylan C; Doluoglu OG; Unluer E Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(5):605-12. PubMed ID: 25498271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required? Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Blondin D; Dietzel F; Hiester A; Schleich C; Thomas C; Rabenalt R; Gabbert HE; Albers P; Antoch G; Arsov C Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3858-3864. PubMed ID: 26920391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of the digital rectal examination as diagnostic test for prostate cancer detection in obese patients. Dell'Atti L J BUON; 2015; 20(6):1601-5. PubMed ID: 26854458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes]. Damiano R; Oliva A; Cantiello F; Esposito C; Perdonà S; De Sio M; Bitonti M; Sacco R; D'Armiento M Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2003 Mar; 75(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12741345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade. Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]