BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25923172)

  • 1. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI of High Grade Brain Gliomas Obtained with Arterial or Venous Waveform Input Function.
    Filice S; Crisi G
    J Neuroimaging; 2016; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 25923172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
    Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in dynamic susceptibility contrast MR perfusion maps generated by different methods implemented in commercial software.
    Orsingher L; Piccinini S; Crisi G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):647-54. PubMed ID: 24879459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
    Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. T2*-correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI from double-echo acquisitions.
    Kleppestø M; Larsson C; Groote I; Salo R; Vardal J; Courivaud F; Bjørnerud A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 24123598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Different Post-Processing Algorithms for Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas.
    Kudo K; Uwano I; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nakamura H; Fujima N; Yamashita F; Goodwin J; Higuchi S; Sasaki M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 16(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27646457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients.
    Ulyte A; Katsaros VK; Liouta E; Stranjalis G; Boskos C; Papanikolaou N; Usinskiene J; Bisdas S
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Dec; 58(12):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 27796446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
    Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
    Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biopsy targeting gliomas: do functional imaging techniques identify similar target areas?
    Weber MA; Henze M; Tüttenberg J; Stieltjes B; Meissner M; Zimmer F; Burkholder I; Kroll A; Combs SE; Vogt-Schaden M; Giesel FL; Zoubaa S; Haberkorn U; Kauczor HU; Essig M
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Dec; 45(12):755-68. PubMed ID: 20829706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of actual with default hematocrit value in dynamic contrast enhanced MR perfusion quantification in grading of human glioma.
    Sahoo P; Gupta PK; Awasthi A; Pandey CM; Patir R; Vaishya S; Saha I; Gupta RK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 34(8):1071-7. PubMed ID: 27211259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
    Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.
    Yin J; Sun H; Yang J; Guo Q
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 24753102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perfusion MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging) with different measurement approaches for the evaluation of blood flow and blood volume in human gliomas.
    Thomsen H; Steffensen E; Larsson EM
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22114021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of renal perfusion: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Winter JD; St Lawrence KS; Cheng HL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Sep; 34(3):608-15. PubMed ID: 21761490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading.
    Su CQ; Lu SS; Han QY; Zhou MD; Hong XN
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):777-787. PubMed ID: 30244590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of AIF ROI selection in DCE-MRI renography: reproducibility and variability of renal perfusion and filtration.
    Cutajar M; Mendichovszky IA; Tofts PS; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):e154-60. PubMed ID: 19541441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
    Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.