BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25923672)

  • 1. Phylogenetic placement of metagenomic reads using the minimum evolution principle.
    Filipski A; Tamura K; Billing-Ross P; Murillo O; Kumar S
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 25923672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SEPP: SATé-enabled phylogenetic placement.
    Mirarab S; Nguyen N; Warnow T
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2012; ():247-58. PubMed ID: 22174280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LSHPlace: fast phylogenetic placement using locality-sensitive hashing.
    Brown DG; Truszkowski J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2013; ():310-9. PubMed ID: 23424136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree.
    Matsen FA; Kodner RB; Armbrust EV
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11():538. PubMed ID: 21034504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond classification: gene-family phylogenies from shotgun metagenomic reads enable accurate community analysis.
    Riesenfeld SJ; Pollard KS
    BMC Genomics; 2013 Jun; 14():419. PubMed ID: 23799973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance, accuracy, and Web server for evolutionary placement of short sequence reads under maximum likelihood.
    Berger SA; Krompass D; Stamatakis A
    Syst Biol; 2011 May; 60(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 21436105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aligning short reads to reference alignments and trees.
    Berger SA; Stamatakis A
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(15):2068-75. PubMed ID: 21636595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A rapid heuristic algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees.
    Rodin A; Li WH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Aug; 16(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 10942605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid phylogenetic and functional classification of short genomic fragments with signature peptides.
    Berendzen J; Bruno WJ; Cohn JD; Hengartner NW; Kuske CR; McMahon BH; Wolinsky MA; Xie G
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Aug; 5():460. PubMed ID: 22925230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TWARIT: an extremely rapid and efficient approach for phylogenetic classification of metagenomic sequences.
    Reddy RM; Mohammed MH; Mande SS
    Gene; 2012 Sep; 505(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 22710135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phylogeny-based classification of microbial communities.
    Tanaseichuk O; Borneman J; Jiang T
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 24369151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SATe-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees.
    Liu K; Warnow TJ; Holder MT; Nelesen SM; Yu J; Stamatakis AP; Linder CR
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 22139466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New approaches to phylogenetic tree search and their application to large numbers of protein alignments.
    Whelan S
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):727-40. PubMed ID: 17849327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AxML: a fast program for sequential and parallel phylogenetic tree calculations based on the maximum likelihood method.
    Stamatakis AP; Ludwig T; Meier H; Wolf MJ
    Proc IEEE Comput Soc Bioinform Conf; 2002; 1():21-8. PubMed ID: 15838120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.
    Nei M; Kumar S; Takahashi K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Oct; 95(21):12390-7. PubMed ID: 9770497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.